These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 19011189

  • 1. Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems.
    Samei E, Ranger NT, MacKenzie A, Honey ID, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE.
    Radiology; 2008 Dec; 249(3):926-37. PubMed ID: 19011189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.
    Samei E, Ranger NT, MacKenzie A, Honey ID, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE.
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3806-17. PubMed ID: 19746814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
    Bertolini M, Nitrosi A, Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Pattacini P, Ginocchi V, Iori M.
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics.
    Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW.
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101916. PubMed ID: 24089918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Measurement of effective detective quantum efficiency for a photon counting scanning mammography system and comparison with two flat panel full-field digital mammography systems.
    Wood TJ, Moore CS, Saunderson JR, Beavis AW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan 16; 63(2):025025. PubMed ID: 29260730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effective DQE (eDQE) and dose to optimize radiographic technical parameters: a survey of pediatric chest X-ray examinations in Korea.
    Park HS, Kim YS, Park OS, Kim ST, Jeon CW, Kim HJ.
    Radiol Med; 2014 Apr 16; 119(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 24337757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. CHARACTERISING THE EOS SLOT-SCANNING SYSTEM WITH THE EFFECTIVE DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY.
    Clavel AH, Monnin P, Létang JM, Verdun FR, Darbon A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun 16; 169(1-4):319-24. PubMed ID: 26538617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.
    Kyprianou IS, Rudin S, Bednarek DR, Hoffmann KR.
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb 16; 32(2):613-26. PubMed ID: 15789608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital radiography.
    Samei E, Ranger NT, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug 21; 56(16):5099-118. PubMed ID: 21775791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics.
    Gopal A, Samant SS.
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun 21; 36(6):2006-15. PubMed ID: 19610289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
    Liu X, Shaw CC, Lai CJ, Wang T.
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan 21; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ, Samei E.
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr 21; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Characterization of imaging performance in differential phase contrast CT compared with the conventional CT: spectrum of noise equivalent quanta NEQ(k).
    Tang X, Yang Y, Tang S.
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul 21; 39(7):4467-82. PubMed ID: 22830779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Correlation between physical measurements and observer evaluations of image quality in digital chest radiography.
    Yalcin A, Olgar T, Sancak T, Atac GK, Akyar S.
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep 21; 47(9):3935-3944. PubMed ID: 32427360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep 21; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.