These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
685 related items for PubMed ID: 19011974
1. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of abattoir wastewater and fruit and vegetable waste in anaerobic sequencing batch reactors. Bouallagui H, Rachdi B, Gannoun H, Hamdi M. Biodegradation; 2009 Jun; 20(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 19011974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition. Bouallagui H, Lahdheb H, Ben Romdan E, Rachdi B, Hamdi M. J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1844-9. PubMed ID: 19117663 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement of activated sludge stabilisation and filterability during anaerobic digestion by fruit and vegetable waste addition. Habiba L, Hassib B, Moktar H. Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(4):1555-60. PubMed ID: 18977658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of biologically pretreated abattoir wastewaters in an upflow anaerobic filter. Gannoun H, Bouallagui H, Okbi A, Sayadi S, Hamdi M. J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct 15; 170(1):263-71. PubMed ID: 19501962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic co-digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes and primary sewage sludge. Velmurugan B, Arathy EC, Hemalatha R, Philip JE, Alwar Ramanujam R. J Environ Sci Eng; 2010 Jan 15; 52(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 21114101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste. Kim JK, Oh BR, Chun YN, Kim SW. J Biosci Bioeng; 2006 Oct 15; 102(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 17116580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater with olive mill solid waste in a tubular digester at mesophilic temperature. Boubaker F, Cheikh Ridha B. Bioresour Technol; 2007 Mar 15; 98(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 16806910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters treating papermill wastewater. Yilmaz T, Yuceer A, Basibuyuk M. Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jan 15; 99(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 17223557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste using temperature-phased anaerobic digestion process. Kim HW, Han SK, Shin HS. Water Sci Technol; 2004 Jan 15; 50(9):107-14. PubMed ID: 15581001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Liu G, Zhang R, El-Mashad HM, Dong R. Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov 15; 100(21):5103-8. PubMed ID: 19570675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge. Song YC, Kwon SJ, Woo JH. Water Res; 2004 Apr 15; 38(7):1653-62. PubMed ID: 15026219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sewage sludge and fruit/vegetable waste: effect of different mixtures on digester stability and methane yield. Arhoun B, Villen-Guzman MD, Vereda-Alonso C, Rodriguez-Maroto JM, Garcia-Herruzo F, Gómez-Lahoz C. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2019 Apr 15; 54(7):628-634. PubMed ID: 30821586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment--a literature review. Sakar S, Yetilmezsoy K, Kocak E. Waste Manag Res; 2009 Feb 15; 27(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 19220987 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of industrial orange waste. Kaparaju PL, Rintala JA. Environ Technol; 2006 Jun 15; 27(6):623-33. PubMed ID: 16865918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A sequencing batch reactor system for high-level biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal from abattoir wastewater. Lemaire R, Yuan Z, Bernet N, Marcos M, Yilmaz G, Keller J. Biodegradation; 2009 Jun 15; 20(3):339-50. PubMed ID: 18937035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of cycle-frequency and temperature on the performance of anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBRs) treating swine waste. Ndegwa PM, Hamilton DW, Lalman JA, Cumba HJ. Bioresour Technol; 2008 Apr 15; 99(6):1972-80. PubMed ID: 17532625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovering biomethane and nutrients from anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and its co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste. Hernández-Shek MA, Cadavid-Rodríguez LS, Bolaños IV, Agudelo-Henao AC. Water Sci Technol; 2016 Apr 15; 73(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 26819391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Increased biogas production in a wastewater treatment plant by anaerobic co-digestion of fruit and vegetable waste and sewer sludge - a full scale study. Park ND, Thring RW, Garton RP, Rutherford MP, Helle SS. Water Sci Technol; 2011 Apr 15; 64(9):1851-6. PubMed ID: 22020478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Interaction between temperature and ammonia in mesophilic digesters for animal waste treatment. Garcia ML, Angenent LT. Water Res; 2009 May 15; 43(9):2373-82. PubMed ID: 19321185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biogas production from co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and fruit and vegetable waste. Pavi S, Kramer LE, Gomes LP, Miranda LAS. Bioresour Technol; 2017 Mar 15; 228():362-367. PubMed ID: 28094090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]