These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1605 related items for PubMed ID: 19014162

  • 21. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: results after 1 year of loading.
    Hallman M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 11669256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK, Ambjørnsen E, Haanaes HR.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Guided bone regeneration with autogenous block grafts applied to Le Fort I osteotomy for treatment of severely resorbed maxillae: a 4- to 6-year prospective study.
    De Santis D, Trevisiol L, D'Agostino A, Cucchi A, De Gemmis A, Nocini PF.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 21504483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with interpositional bone grafting/Le Fort I osteotomy and endosteal implants: a 11-16 year follow-up.
    Nyström E, Nilson H, Gunne J, Lundgren S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19046853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
    Bystedt H, Rasmusson L.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla including immediate fixed provisional restoration without the use of bone grafting: a review of 1-year outcome data from a long-term prospective clinical trial.
    Toljanic JA, Baer RA, Ekstrand K, Thor A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jun; 24(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 19587876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Sinus augmentation bone grafts for the provision of dental implants: report of clinical outcome.
    McCarthy C, Patel RR, Wragg PF, Brook IM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003 Jun; 18(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 12814312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Efficacy of implant placement after bone grafting for three-dimensional reconstruction of the posterior jaw.
    Bahat O, Fontanessi RV.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Jun; 21(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 11490399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 81.