These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

342 related items for PubMed ID: 19017511

  • 1. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan.
    Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T, Yoshikawa A, Namimatsu E, Yoshizumi T.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Oct 28; 52(18):1450-5. PubMed ID: 19017511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using the 128-slice MDCT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Jeong DW, Choo KS, Baik SK, Kim YW, Jeon UB, Kim JS, Lim SJ.
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar 01; 52(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 21498343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study.
    Hausleiter J, Meyer TS, Martuscelli E, Spagnolo P, Yamamoto H, Carrascosa P, Anger T, Lehmkuhl L, Alkadhi H, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Hein F, Bischoff B, Kuse M, Schömig A, Achenbach S.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 May 01; 5(5):484-93. PubMed ID: 22595156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Comparison of radiation dose reduction of prospective ECG-gated one beat scan using 320 area detector CT coronary angiography and prospective ECG-gated helical scan with high helical pitch (FlashScan) using 64 multidetector-row CT coronary angiography].
    Matsutani H, Sano T, Kondo T, Fujimoto S, Sekine T, Arai T, Morita H, Takase S.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Dec 20; 66(12):1548-54. PubMed ID: 21282910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated vs. retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using 128-slice MDCT patients with chest pain: diagnostic performance and radiation dose.
    Kim JS, Choo KS, Jeong DW, Chun KJ, Park YH, Song SG, Park JH, Kim JH, Kim J, Han D, Lim SJ.
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Oct 01; 52(8):860-5. PubMed ID: 21873509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prospective electrocardiogram-gated axial 64-detector computed tomographic angiography vs retrospective gated helical technique to assess coronary artery bypass graft anastomosis: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Machida H, Masukawa A, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Suzuki K, Ueno E, Kodera K, Nakano K, Shen Y.
    Circ J; 2010 Apr 01; 74(4):735-40. PubMed ID: 20154407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating.
    Husmann L, Herzog BA, Gaemperli O, Tatsugami F, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Veit-Haibach P, Wyss CA, Landmesser U, Kaufmann PA.
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Mar 01; 30(5):600-7. PubMed ID: 19106197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. First experience with 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scanning with prospective electrocardiogram gating to reduce radiation dose.
    Hoe J, Toh KH.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009 Mar 01; 3(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 19577215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retrospective gating vs. prospective triggering for noninvasive coronary angiography: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose using a 256-slice CT scanner with 270 ms gantry rotation.
    Law WY, Yang CC, Chen LK, Huang TC, Lu KM, Wu TH, Mok GS.
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan 01; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 21145027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Qin J, Liu LY, Meng XC, Zhang JS, Dong YX, Fang Y, Shan H.
    Clin Imaging; 2011 Jan 01; 35(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 21513855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering.
    Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL, Cortinovis S, Mushtaq S, Bertella E, Annoni A, Formenti A, Nobili E, Trabattoni D, Montorsi P, Ballerini G, Agostoni P, Pepi M.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Jul 21; 54(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 19608033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Coronary CT angiography with single-source and dual-source CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose between prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated protocols.
    Sabarudin A, Sun Z, Yusof AK.
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep 30; 168(2):746-53. PubMed ID: 23098849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prospective electrocardiogram-gated delayed enhanced multidetector computed tomography accurately quantifies infarct size and reduces radiation exposure.
    Chang HJ, George RT, Schuleri KH, Evers K, Kitagawa K, Lima JA, Lardo AC.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Apr 30; 2(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 19580722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row multidetector CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-gating combined with fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in the assessment of coronary artery bypass: evaluation of dose reduction and image quality.
    Ippolito D, Fior D, Franzesi CT, Riva L, Casiraghi A, Sironi S.
    Radiol Med; 2017 Dec 30; 122(12):893-901. PubMed ID: 28849537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.