These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

502 related items for PubMed ID: 1901872

  • 1. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I, Lutz F.
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF.
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
    Rodrigues Junior SA, Pin LF, Machado G, Della Bona A, Demarco FF.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010 Feb; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
    Karaağaclioğlu L, Zaimoğlu A, Akören AC.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
    Smith ED, Martin FE.
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS, Faria-e-Silva AL, Casselli H, Martins LR.
    Gen Dent; 2012 Feb; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O, Uçtaşh M, Alaçam A, Omürlü H.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques.
    Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Herteanu L, Judes H.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9049916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quantitative in vivo evaluation of four restorative concepts for mixed Class V restorations.
    Krejci I, Lutz F, Loher CE.
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jun; 22(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 1882038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
    Haller B, Trojanski A.
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.