These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

502 related items for PubMed ID: 1901872

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P, Waern R.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope.
    Niranjan B, Shashikiran ND, Singla S, Thakur R, Dubey A, Maran S.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016 Aug; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
    Schuckar M, Geurtsen W.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Marginal characteristics of different filling materials and filling methods with standardized cavity preparation.
    Stoll R, Remes H, Kunzelmann KH, Stachniss V.
    J Adhes Dent; 2000 Oct; 2(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11317400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. An evaluation of different adhesive restorations in cervical lesions.
    Vanherle G, Lambrechts P, Braem M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Mar; 65(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 1829111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Microleakage in three designs of glass ionomer under composite resin restorations.
    Gordon M, Wasserstein A, Gorfil C, Imber S.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Mar; 18(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 2037937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. An in vitro microleakage study of the 'bonded-base' restorative technique.
    Yap AU, Mok BY, Pearson G.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 9131479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
    Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J.
    Dent Mater; 2001 Jul; 17(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 11356214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.