These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

351 related items for PubMed ID: 19021504

  • 1. Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis.
    Akin OK, Serdar MA, Cizmeci Z, Genc O, Aydin S.
    Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2009 Jun; 53(Pt 2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19021504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.
    Lamchiagdhase P, Preechaborisutkul K, Lomsomboon P, Srisuchart P, Tantiniti P, Khan-u-Ra N, Preechaborisutkul B.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Aug; 358(1-2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16018883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy.
    Yüksel H, Kiliç E, Ekinci A, Evliyaoğlu O.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2013 Jul; 27(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 23852791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers.
    Wah DT, Wises PK, Butch AW.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 15842056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of three automated systems for urine chemistry and sediment analysis in routine laboratory practice.
    Budak YU, Huysal K.
    Clin Lab; 2011 Feb; 57(1-2):47-52. PubMed ID: 21391464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer].
    Park J, Kim J.
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug; 28(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18728375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.
    Laiwejpithaya S, Wongkrajang P, Reesukumal K, Bucha C, Meepanya S, Pattanavin C, Khejonnit V, Chuntarut A.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2018 Feb; 32(2):. PubMed ID: 28464263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer and comparative study with JCCLS reference method.
    Sutheesophon K, Wiwanitkit V, Boonchalermvichian C, Charuruks N.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85 Suppl 1():S246-52. PubMed ID: 12188419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Urine sediment analysis by the Yellow IRIS automated urinalysis workstation.
    Wargotz ES, Hyde JE, Karcher DS, Hitlan JP, Wilkinson DS.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Dec; 88(6):746-8. PubMed ID: 3687846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination.
    Xiang D, Cong Y, Wang C, Yue J, Ma X, Lu Y, Liu P, Ma J.
    Clin Lab; 2012 Dec; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.