These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


386 related items for PubMed ID: 19027565

  • 1. Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds.
    Berdahl JP, Jun B, DeStafeno JJ, Kim T.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2091-5. PubMed ID: 19027565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of tips in coaxial microincision cataract surgery with the bevel-down technique.
    Kim EK, Jo KJ, Joo CK.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):2028-33. PubMed ID: 21907535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Re: Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds.
    Packard R.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):797-8; author reply 798. PubMed ID: 19393867
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of microcoaxial with standard clear corneal incisions in torsional handpiece cataract surgery.
    Park YG, Chung SH, Joo CK.
    Ophthalmologica; 2012 May; 227(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 21832823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract incisions.
    Khokhar SK, Saxena R.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1322-3; author reply 1323. PubMed ID: 19545836
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
    Elkady B, Piñero D, Alió JL.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 19251139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Kahraman G, Amon M, Franz C, Prinz A, Abela-Formanek C.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mini-flared Kelman tip, reverse tip, and sidewinder tip with torsional phaco: a prospective randomized comparative study.
    Hida WT, Tzelikis PF, Nakano CT, Motta AF, Alves MR.
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2015 Apr; 78(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 25714532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Corneal wound architecture and integrity after phacoemulsification evaluation of coaxial, microincision coaxial, and microincision bimanual techniques.
    Berdahl JP, DeStafeno JJ, Kim T.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):510-5. PubMed ID: 17321403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
    Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Thieme H, Dick HB.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
    Kim EC, Byun YS, Kim MS.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M, Supady E, Loba P, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Alió J, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy M.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
    Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Gabriel P, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
    Lee KM, Kwon HG, Joo CK.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vivo architectural analysis of clear corneal incisions using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
    Dupont-Monod S, Labbé A, Fayol N, Chassignol A, Bourges JL, Baudouin C.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 19251136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery.
    Dosso AA, Cottet L, Burgener ND, Di Nardo S.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18242455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: Microincision versus standard technique.
    Mencucci R, Ponchietti C, Virgili G, Giansanti F, Menchini U.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 16863974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Endothelial cell loss: Biaxial small-incision torsional phacoemulsification versus biaxial small-incision longitudinal phacoemulsification.
    Gonen T, Sever O, Horozoglu F, Yasar M, Keskinbora KH.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1918-24. PubMed ID: 22980723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Torsional ultrasound efficiency under different vacuum levels in different degrees of nuclear cataract.
    Wang Y, Xia Y, Zeng M, Liu X, Luo L, Chen B, Liu Y, Liu Y.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1941-5. PubMed ID: 19878827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.