These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 19029720

  • 1. Improvement in the removal of micropollutants at Porto Marghera industrial wastewaters treatment plant by MBR technology.
    Cattaneo S, Marciano F, Masotti L, Vecchiato G, Verlicchi P, Zaffaroni C.
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(9):1789-96. PubMed ID: 19029720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Membrane bio-reactor for advanced textile wastewater treatment and reuse.
    Lubello C, Gori R.
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 15344781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Efficacy and reliability of upgraded industrial treatment plant at Porto Marghera, near Venice, Italy, in removing nutrients and dangerous micropollutants from petrochemical wastewaters.
    Verlicchi P, Cattaneo S, Marciano F, Masotti L, Vecchiato G, Zaffaroni C.
    Water Environ Res; 2011 Aug; 83(8):739-49. PubMed ID: 21905411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Membrane bio-reactor for textile wastewater treatment plant upgrading.
    Lubello C, Gori R.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Aug; 52(4):91-8. PubMed ID: 16235750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The fate of selected micropollutants in a single-house MBR.
    Abegglen C, Joss A, McArdell CS, Fink G, Schlüsener MP, Ternes TA, Siegrist H.
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(7):2036-46. PubMed ID: 19269669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effectiveness of domestic wastewater treatment using microbial fuel cells at ambient and mesophilic temperatures.
    Ahn Y, Logan BE.
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jan; 101(2):469-75. PubMed ID: 19734045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Performance of an overland flow system for advanced treatment of wastewater plant effluent.
    Taebi A, Droste RL.
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 17499907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Limiting the emissions of micro-pollutants: what efficiency can we expect from wastewater treatment plants?
    Choubert JM, Martin Ruel S, Esperanza M, Budzinski H, Miège C, Lagarrigue C, Coquery M.
    Water Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 63(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 21245554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Appropriate basis of effluent standards for industrial wastewaters.
    Tilche A, Orhon D.
    Water Sci Technol; 2002 Sep; 45(12):1-11. PubMed ID: 12201089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Performance assessment of AS-SBR and UF-MBR for hotel wastewater treatment.
    Libralato G, Volpi Ghirardini A, Avezzù F.
    Water Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 60(7):1701-9. PubMed ID: 19809133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Characterizing the pollution produced by an industrial area: chemometric methods applied to the Lagoon of Venice.
    Carrer S, Leardi R.
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Oct 15; 370(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 16857239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effectiveness and efficiency of phytoremediation of a multicontaminated industrial site: Porto Marghera (Venice Lagoon, Italy).
    Guarino C, Sciarrillo R.
    Chemosphere; 2017 Sep 15; 183():371-379. PubMed ID: 28554021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Occurrence of pharmaceutically active compounds during 1-year period in wastewaters from four wastewater treatment plants in Seville (Spain).
    Santos JL, Aparicio I, Callejón M, Alonso E.
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 May 30; 164(2-3):1509-16. PubMed ID: 18990491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Fungal post-treatment of pulp mill effluents for the removal of recalcitrant pollutants.
    Ortega-Clemente A, Caffarel-Méndez S, Ponce-Noyola MT, Barrera-Córtes J, Poggi-Varaldo HM.
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Mar 30; 100(6):1885-94. PubMed ID: 19010664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Assessment of electrocoagulation for the treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater.
    El-Naas MH, Al-Zuhair S, Al-Lobaney A, Makhlouf S.
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Oct 30; 91(1):180-5. PubMed ID: 19717218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Biological treatment processes for fish processing wastewater--a review.
    Chowdhury P, Viraraghavan T, Srinivasan A.
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jan 30; 101(2):439-49. PubMed ID: 19751972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: an effective solution for upgrading a large wastewater treatment plant.
    Mannina G, Viviani G.
    Water Sci Technol; 2009 Jan 30; 60(5):1103-16. PubMed ID: 19717896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reduction in excess sludge production in a dairy wastewater treatment plant via nozzle-cavitation treatment: case study of an on-farm wastewater treatment plant.
    Hirooka K, Asano R, Yokoyama A, Okazaki M, Sakamoto A, Nakai Y.
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jun 30; 100(12):3161-6. PubMed ID: 19246193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.