These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

796 related items for PubMed ID: 19032662

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F, Zwizwai M, Nyström L, Lindmark G.
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary.
    D'Aniello G, Bocchi C, Florio P, Ignacchiti E, Guidoni CG, Centini G, Cito G, Picciolini E, Severi FM, Petraglia F.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Verocchi G, Volpe A.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr 01; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug 01; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Induction of labour with vaginal prostaglandin tablet vs gel.
    Khan ZA, Abdul B, Majoko F.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Aug 01; 31(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 21823846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.