These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
643 related items for PubMed ID: 19033431
21. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems. Hintze H, Wenzel A. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C. Caries Res; 1994 Jan; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs. Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC, Geraets WG. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Approximal caries diagnosis after data import from different digital radiography systems: interobserver agreement and comparison to histological hard-tissue sections. Schulte AG, Wittchen A, Stachniss V, Jacquet W, Bottenberg P. Caries Res; 2008 Jun; 42(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18063865 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries. Janhom A, van Ginkel FC, van Amerongen JP, van der Stelt PF. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]