These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1110 related items for PubMed ID: 19034179

  • 1. Comparison of bioabsorbable versus metallic implant fixation for physeal and epiphyseal fractures of the distal tibia.
    Podeszwa DA, Wilson PL, Holland AR, Copley LA.
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2008 Dec; 28(8):859-63. PubMed ID: 19034179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Operative Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures in Children Managed With Epiphyseal Screws: A Comparison of Outcomes When Screws Are Retained Versus Removed Following Fracture Union.
    Zimmerman R, Rupp G, Barger K, Fang W, Thomas E, Bastrom T, Pennock A, Schlechter J.
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2024 Aug 01; 44(7):e588-e591. PubMed ID: 38869022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Is the use of arch bars or interdental wire fixation necessary for successful outcomes in the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures?
    Bell RB, Wilson DM.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct 01; 66(10):2116-22. PubMed ID: 18848111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of surgical outcomes between bioabsorbable and metal screw fixation for distal tibial physeal fracture in children and adolescent.
    Kim WS, Oh MJ, Park MS, Sung KH.
    Int Orthop; 2024 Oct 01; 48(10):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 39183229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of bioabsorbable versus metallic screws for posterior cruciate ligament inlay graft fixation: a comparative study.
    Gupta A, Lattermann C, Busam M, Riff A, Bach BR, Wang VM.
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr 01; 37(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 19168806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Bong MR, Romero A, Kubiak E, Iesaka K, Heywood CS, Kummer F, Rosen J, Jazrawi L.
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct 01; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Treatment of distal femur and proximal tibia fractures with external fixation followed by planned conversion to internal fixation.
    Parekh AA, Smith WR, Silva S, Agudelo JF, Williams AE, Hak D, Morgan SJ.
    J Trauma; 2008 Mar 01; 64(3):736-9. PubMed ID: 18332816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Complications after zygoma fracture fixation: is there a difference between biodegradable materials and how do they compare with titanium osteosynthesis?
    Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Yerit K, Voracek M, Turhani D, Watzinger F, Enislidis G.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr 01; 101(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 16545702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.