These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 19048940

  • 1. [Implantation of a vibratory mass transducer on the round window: a report of two cases].
    Osaki Y, Sasaki T, Kondoh K, Iwaki T, Kubo T.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2008 Oct; 111(10):668-71. PubMed ID: 19048940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
    Colletti L, Mandalà M, Colletti V.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window.
    Colletti V, Soli SD, Carner M, Colletti L.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):600-8. PubMed ID: 17062502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016 Oct; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C, Perotti M, Beltrame MA, Giarbini N.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009 Oct; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty.
    Rajan GP, Lampacher P, Ambett R, Dittrich G, Kuthubutheen J, Wood B, McArthur A, Marino R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21206391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
    Verhaegen VJ, Mulder JJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H, Schwab B, Hinze AL, Giere T, Lenarz T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Electrocochleography in round window Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
    Colletti V, Mandalà M, Colletti L.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 146(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 22140205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
    Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A, Schnabl J, Koci V.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E, Riss D, Honeder C, Arnoldner C, Hamzavi JS, Baumgartner WD, Flak S, Gstoettner W.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
    Grégoire A, Van Damme JP, Gilain C, Bihin B, Garin P.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Radiological control of the floating mass transducer attached to the round window.
    Todt I, Rademacher G, Wagner J, Mittmann P, Basta D, Ernst A.
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013 Feb; 2013():902945. PubMed ID: 24327808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical Experience of Vibroplasty With Direct Coupling to the Oval Window Without Use of a Coupler.
    Kwak SH, Moon YM, Nam GS, Bae SH, Kim SH, Jung J, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Dec; 130(12):E926-E932. PubMed ID: 31977072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Direct round window stimulation with the Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge: 5 years of experience using a technique without interposed fascia.
    Skarzynski H, Olszewski L, Skarzynski PH, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Porowski M, Mrowka M, Pilka A.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 271(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 23512431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A retrofacial approach of round window vibroplasty during Vibrant Soundbridge implantation for patients with congenital ear malformation.
    Li J, Wang D, Zhao C, Yang L, Ren R, Zhao S.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 142():110600. PubMed ID: 33412340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Round window stimulation with the Vibrant Soundbridge: Comparison of direct and indirect coupling.
    Olszewski L, Jedrzejczak WW, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Dec; 127(12):2843-2849. PubMed ID: 28220497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses.
    Bernardeschi D, Hoffman C, Benchaa T, Labassi S, Beliaeff M, Sterkers O, Grayeli AB.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011 Dec; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids.
    Gunduz B, Atas A, Bayazıt YA, Goksu N, Gokdogan C, Tutar H.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Marino R, Linton N, Eikelboom RH, Statham E, Rajan GP.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.