These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

639 related items for PubMed ID: 19049531

  • 1. Wear of feldspathic ceramic, nano-filled composite resin and acrylic resin artificial teeth when opposed to different antagonists.
    Ghazal M, Hedderich J, Kern M.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 19049531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 19033028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel.
    Ghazal M, Yang B, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 17688934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Wear resistance of artificial denture teeth.
    Ghazal M, Steiner M, Kern M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 21(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 18546774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite resin denture teeth under different loading forces.
    Ghazal M, Kern M.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 18976262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Three-body wear of resin denture teeth with and without nanofillers.
    Stober T, Henninger M, Schmitter M, Pritsch M, Rammelsberg P.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 20141815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Wear of denture teeth and their human enamel antagonists.
    Ghazal M, Kern M.
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Feb; 41(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 20165747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material.
    Hahnel S, Behr M, Handel G, Rosentritt M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth.
    Zeng J, Sato Y, Ohkubo C, Hosoi T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 16275306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD, Zellweger G, Cavalleri A, Ferracane J.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y, Suzuki S, Fukushima S.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact.
    Stober T, Lutz T, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 16084585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator.
    Mehl C, Scheibner S, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1382-9. PubMed ID: 17210173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
    Elmaria A, Goldstein G, Vijayaraghavan T, Legeros RZ, Hittelman EL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A, Suzuki S, Tanaka T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of long-term simulated RPD clasp attachment/detachment on retention loss and wear for two clasp types and three abutment material surfaces.
    Helal MA, Baraka OA, Sanad ME, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):370-7. PubMed ID: 22443158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Shock absorbability and hardness of commercially available denture teeth.
    Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Mizuno I, Hasegawa A.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Jul; 15(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12066486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials.
    Kunzelmann KH, Jelen B, Mehl A, Hickel R.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jul; 4(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 11862884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV, Engelmeier RL, Powers JM, Triolo PT.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.