These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

288 related items for PubMed ID: 19054613

  • 1. Nanofiltration processes applied to the removal of phenyl-ureas in natural waters.
    Benítez FJ, Acero JL, Real FJ, García C.
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jun 15; 165(1-3):714-23. PubMed ID: 19054613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Removal of phenyl-urea herbicides in ultrapure water by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes.
    Benitez FJ, Acero JL, Real FJ, Garcia C.
    Water Res; 2009 Feb 15; 43(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 18947854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater.
    Benítez FJ, Acero JL, Leal AI, González M.
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar 15; 162(2-3):1438-45. PubMed ID: 18650003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dichloroaniline retention by nanofiltration membranes.
    Causserand C, Aimar P, Cravedi JP, Singlande E.
    Water Res; 2005 Apr 15; 39(8):1594-600. PubMed ID: 15878032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Kinetics of the transformation of phenyl-urea herbicides during ozonation of natural waters: rate constants and model predictions.
    Benitez FJ, Real FJ, Acero JL, Garcia C.
    Water Res; 2007 Oct 15; 41(18):4073-84. PubMed ID: 17618669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Photochemical oxidation processes for the elimination of phenyl-urea herbicides in waters.
    Benitez FJ, Real FJ, Acero JL, Garcia C.
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Nov 16; 138(2):278-87. PubMed ID: 16839678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Performance of selected anion exchange resins for the treatment of a high DOC content surface water.
    Humbert H, Gallard H, Suty H, Croué JP.
    Water Res; 2005 May 16; 39(9):1699-708. PubMed ID: 15899268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Removal of cyanobacterial metabolites by nanofiltration from two treated waters.
    Dixon MB, Falconet C, Ho L, Chow CW, O'Neill BK, Newcombe G.
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Apr 15; 188(1-3):288-95. PubMed ID: 21339048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration.
    Figoli A, Cassano A, Criscuoli A, Mozumder MS, Uddin MT, Islam MA, Drioli E.
    Water Res; 2010 Jan 15; 44(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19781734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface water.
    Verliefde AR, Heijman SG, Cornelissen ER, Amy G, Van der Bruggen B, van Dijk JC.
    Water Res; 2007 Aug 15; 41(15):3227-40. PubMed ID: 17583761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Retention of pesticide Endosulfan by nanofiltration: influence of organic matter-pesticide complexation and solute-membrane interactions.
    De Munari A, Semiao AJ, Antizar-Ladislao B.
    Water Res; 2013 Jun 15; 47(10):3484-96. PubMed ID: 23615337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Membrane filtration technologies applied to municipal secondary effluents for potential reuse.
    Acero JL, Benitez FJ, Leal AI, Real FJ, Teva F.
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 May 15; 177(1-3):390-8. PubMed ID: 20047792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Removal of bisphenol A by a nanofiltration membrane in view of drinking water production.
    Zhang Y, Causserand C, Aimar P, Cravedi JP.
    Water Res; 2006 Dec 15; 40(20):3793-9. PubMed ID: 17074381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Removal of trihalomethanes from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes.
    Uyak V, Koyuncu I, Oktem I, Cakmakci M, Toroz I.
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr 01; 152(2):789-94. PubMed ID: 17768007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Selective removal of dissolved uranium in drinking water by nanofiltration.
    Favre-Réguillon A, Lebuzit G, Murat D, Foos J, Mansour C, Draye M.
    Water Res; 2008 Feb 01; 42(4-5):1160-6. PubMed ID: 17888486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Activated soil filters for removal of biocides from contaminated run-off and waste-waters.
    Bester K, Banzhaf S, Burkhardt M, Janzen N, Niederstrasser B, Scheytt T.
    Chemosphere; 2011 Nov 01; 85(8):1233-40. PubMed ID: 21855108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Investigation of membrane fouling by synthetic and natural particles.
    Kweon JH, Lawler DF.
    Water Sci Technol; 2004 Nov 01; 50(12):279-85. PubMed ID: 15686032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Dsorption of estrone on nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in water and wastewater treatment.
    Nghiem LD, Schäfer AI, Waite TD.
    Water Sci Technol; 2002 Nov 01; 46(4-5):265-72. PubMed ID: 12361019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C, Drewes JE.
    Water Res; 2007 Sep 01; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reduction of natural organic matter by nanofiltration process.
    Chang EE, Chen YW, Lin YL, Chiang PC.
    Chemosphere; 2009 Aug 01; 76(9):1265-72. PubMed ID: 19545886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.