These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1619 related items for PubMed ID: 19056294

  • 1. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
    Jamieson WR, Gudas VM, Burr LH, Janusz MT, Fradet GJ, Ling H, Germann E, Lichtenstein SV.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR, David TE, Feindel CM, Miyagishima RT, Germann E.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
    Jamieson WR, Miyagishima RT, Burr LH, Lichtenstein SV, Fradet GJ, Janusz MT.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: 10 year comparison of structural valve deterioration.
    Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Tyers GF, Munro AI.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 8162218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.
    Eric Jamieson WR, Marchand MA, Pelletier CL, Norton R, Pellerin M, Dubiel TW, Aupart MR, Daenen WJ, Holden MP, David TE, Ryba EA, Anderson WN.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M, Kulik A, Rubens FD, Bédard P, Masters RG, Pipe AL, Mesana TG.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
    Chaudhry MA, Raco L, Muriithi EW, Bernacca GM, Tolland MM, Wheatley DJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prostheses at 7 years.
    Jamieson WR, Tyers GF, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Janusz MT, Ling H.
    Circulation; 1991 Nov; 84(5 Suppl):III145-52. PubMed ID: 1934404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses.
    Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Anderson WN.
    Can J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 15(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 10504178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
    McClure RS, Narayanasamy N, Wiegerinck E, Lipsitz S, Maloney A, Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mykén PS.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance.
    Jamieson WR, Allen P, Miyagishima RT, Gerein AN, Munro AI, Burr LH, Tyers GF.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
    Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul 21; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Use of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of a patient selection policy.
    Louagie Y, Noirhomme P, Aranguis E, Eucher P, Vanruyssevelt P, Buche M, Dion R, Jaumin P, Schoevaerdts JC, Chalant CH.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Oct 21; 104(4):1013-24. PubMed ID: 1405658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
    Murakami T, Eishi K, Nakano S, Kobayashi J, Sasako Y, Isobe F, Kosakai Y, Kito Y, Kawashima Y.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan 21; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Structural valve deterioration in elderly patient populations with the Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: a comparative study.
    Burr LH, Jamieson WR, Munro AI, Miyagishima RT, Janusz MT, Ling H, Hayden RI, Tutassaura H, Fradet G, Gudas VM.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Sep 21; 1(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 1341227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Long-term results with the Xenomedica porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position.
    Santini F, Auriemma S, Casali G, Rossi A, Lusini M, Mazzucco A.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov 21; 10(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 11767188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
    Legarra JJ, Llorens R, Catalan M, Segura I, Trenor AM, de Buruaga JS, Rabago G, Sarralde A.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan 21; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves.
    Sarris GE, Robbins RC, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Moore KA, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Circulation; 1993 Nov 21; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 81.