These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
161 related items for PubMed ID: 19057250
21. Value of magnetic resonance myelography in the diagnosis of disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Pui MH, Husen YA. Australas Radiol; 2000 Aug; 44(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 10974720 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Modified Pfirrmann grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Griffith JF, Wang YX, Antonio GE, Choi KC, Yu A, Ahuja AT, Leung PC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov 15; 32(24):E708-12. PubMed ID: 18007231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI for identifying the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis in cervical radiculopathy: a prospective study. Douglas-Akinwande AC, Rydberg J, Shah MV, Phillips MD, Caldemeyer KS, Lurito JT, Ying J, Mathews VP. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan 15; 194(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 20028905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Using Magnetic Resonance Myelography to Improve Interobserver Agreement in the Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis and Root Compression. Al-Tameemi HN, Al-Essawi S, Shukri M, Naji FK. Asian Spine J; 2017 Apr 15; 11(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 28443163 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Improved magnetic resonance myelography of the lumbar spine using image fusion and volumetry. Eberhardt K, Ganslandt O, Stadlbauer A. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb 15; 20(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 24328762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration. Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morishita Y, Wang JC. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun 15; 21(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 18525490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments during lumbar spine accessory motion testing. Landel R, Kulig K, Fredericson M, Li B, Powers CM. Phys Ther; 2008 Jan 15; 88(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18029394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Qualitative assessment of cervical spinal stenosis: observer variability on CT and MR images. Stafira JS, Sonnad JR, Yuh WT, Huard DR, Acker RE, Nguyen DL, Maley JE, Ramji FG, Li WB, Loftus CM. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Apr 15; 24(4):766-9. PubMed ID: 12695220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The imaging of lumbar spinal stenosis. Saifuddin A. Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug 15; 55(8):581-94. PubMed ID: 10964728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [MR myelography in spinal canal stenosis]. Freund M, Hutzelmann A, Steffens JC, Buhl R, Heller M. Rofo; 1997 Nov 15; 167(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 9440892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis? Sasaki K, Hasegawa K, Shimoda H, Keiji I, Homma T. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jul 15; 23 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 23542928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Improved accuracy of diagnosis of lumbar intra and/or extra-foraminal stenosis by use of three-dimensional MR imaging: comparison with conventional MR imaging. Yamada H, Terada M, Iwasaki H, Endo T, Okada M, Nakao S, Hashizume H, Minamide A, Nakagawa Y, Nishi H, Tsutsui S, Oka H, Yoshida M. J Orthop Sci; 2015 Mar 15; 20(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 25491380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis by different methods]. Xu WX, Wang J, Lu D, Wu Z, Zhu WM, Zhang C. Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Oct 15; 22(10):738-40. PubMed ID: 19902746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Interobserver agreement on MRI evaluation of patients with cervical radiculopathy. Kuijper B, Beelen A, van der Kallen BF, Nollet F, Lycklama A Nijeholt GJ, de Visser M, Tans JT. Clin Radiol; 2011 Jan 15; 66(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 21147295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis. Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Carragee E, Carrino JA, Kaiser J, Sequeiros RT, Lecomte AR, Grove MR, Blood EA, Pearson LH, Weinstein JN, Herzog R. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun 15; 33(14):1605-10. PubMed ID: 18552677 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Observer variability in assessing lumbar spinal stenosis severity on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to cross-sectional spinal canal area. Speciale AC, Pietrobon R, Urban CW, Richardson WJ, Helms CA, Major N, Enterline D, Hey L, Haglund M, Turner DA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 May 15; 27(10):1082-6. PubMed ID: 12004176 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Lumbar stenosis rates in symptomatic patients using weight-bearing and recumbent magnetic resonance imaging. Gilbert JW, Martin JC, Wheeler GR, Storey BB, Mick GE, Richardson GB, Herder SL, Gyarteng-Dakwa K. J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Oct 15; 34(8):557-61. PubMed ID: 21907413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Is multidetector computed tomography comparable to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lumbar foraminal stenosis? Kang WY, Ahn JM, Lee JW, Lee E, Bae YJ, Seo J, Kim J, Kang HS. Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb 15; 58(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 27055917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The value of dynamic radiographic myelography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging in detection lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A prospective study. Merkle M, Maier G, Danz S, Kaminsky J, Tatagiba MS, Hebela NM, Roser F. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Apr 15; 143():4-8. PubMed ID: 26874937 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of healthy volunteers: pilot study results from the population-based SHIP study. Hegenscheid K, Kühn JP, Völzke H, Biffar R, Hosten N, Puls R. Rofo; 2009 Aug 15; 181(8):748-59. PubMed ID: 19598074 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]