These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

360 related items for PubMed ID: 19057409

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison between linear and daily undulating periodized resistance training to increase strength.
    Prestes J, Frollini AB, de Lima C, Donatto FF, Foschini D, de Cássia Marqueti R, Figueira A, Fleck SJ.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Dec; 23(9):2437-42. PubMed ID: 19910831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of periodization models during nine weeks with equated volume and intensity for strength.
    Buford TW, Rossi SJ, Smith DB, Warren AJ.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Nov; 21(4):1245-50. PubMed ID: 18076234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Linear and daily undulating resistance training periodizations have differential beneficial effects in young sedentary women.
    de Lima C, Boullosa DA, Frollini AB, Donatto FF, Leite RD, Gonelli PR, Montebello MI, Prestes J, Cesar MC.
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 33(9):723-7. PubMed ID: 22562746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise vs. linear periodization on strength improvement in college athletes.
    Mann JB, Thyfault JP, Ivey PA, Sayers SP.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1718-23. PubMed ID: 20543732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dose-response of 1, 3, and 5 sets of resistance exercise on strength, local muscular endurance, and hypertrophy.
    Radaelli R, Fleck SJ, Leite T, Leite RD, Pinto RS, Fernandes L, Simão R.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 May; 29(5):1349-58. PubMed ID: 25546444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of linear vs. daily undulatory periodized resistance training on maximal and submaximal strength gains.
    Miranda F, Simão R, Rhea M, Bunker D, Prestes J, Leite RD, Miranda H, de Salles BF, Novaes J.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jul; 25(7):1824-30. PubMed ID: 21499134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of early phase adaptations for traditional strength and endurance, and low velocity resistance training programs in college-aged women.
    Rana SR, Chleboun GS, Gilders RM, Hagerman FC, Herman JR, Hikida RS, Kushnick MR, Staron RS, Toma K.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Jan; 22(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 18296964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance.
    Hartmann H, Wirth K, Keiner M, Mickel C, Sander A, Szilvas E.
    Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 45(10):1373-86. PubMed ID: 26133514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Physical performance and cardiovascular responses to an acute bout of heavy resistance circuit training versus traditional strength training.
    Alcaraz PE, Sánchez-Lorente J, Blazevich AJ.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 May; 22(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 18438256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The influence of periodized resistance training on strength changes in men and women.
    Kell RT.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Mar; 25(3):735-44. PubMed ID: 20613654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Three sets of weight training superior to 1 set with equal intensity for eliciting strength.
    Rhea MR, Alvar BA, Ball SD, Burkett LN.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2002 Nov; 16(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 12423180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for local muscular endurance.
    Rhea MR, Phillips WT, Burkett LN, Stone WJ, Ball SD, Alvar BA, Thomas AB.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2003 Feb; 17(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 12580661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Similarity in adaptations to high-resistance circuit vs. traditional strength training in resistance-trained men.
    Alcaraz PE, Perez-Gomez J, Chavarrias M, Blazevich AJ.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2519-27. PubMed ID: 21659889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of traditional and weekly undulating periodized strength training programs with total volume and intensity equated.
    Apel JM, Lacey RM, Kell RT.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Mar; 25(3):694-703. PubMed ID: 20581703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of traditional and block periodized strength training programs in trained athletes.
    Bartolomei S, Hoffman JR, Merni F, Stout JR.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Apr; 28(4):990-7. PubMed ID: 24476775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Early-phase adaptations to a split-body, linear periodization resistance training program in college-aged and middle-aged men.
    Kerksick CM, Wilborn CD, Campbell BI, Roberts MD, Rasmussen CJ, Greenwood M, Kreider RB.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 May; 23(3):962-71. PubMed ID: 19387379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.