These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
298 related items for PubMed ID: 19062121
1. First certified reference materials for molecular fingerprinting of two approved probiotic Bacillus strains. De Baets L, Van Iwaarden P, Meeus N, Schimmel H, Philipp W, Emons H. Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Jan 31; 129(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 19062121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Numbers and strains of lactobacilli in some probiotic products. Coeuret V, Gueguen M, Vernoux JP. Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Dec 15; 97(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 15541801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection and quantification of spoilage and pathogenic Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis by real-time PCR. Fernández-No IC, Guarddon M, Böhme K, Cepeda A, Calo-Mata P, Barros-Velázquez J. Food Microbiol; 2011 May 15; 28(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 21356471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamics of bacterial community in solid-state fermented feed revealed by 16S rRNA. Yu Z, Dong B, Lu W. Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Aug 15; 49(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 19413759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of species identity of commercial bacterial cultures intended for probiotic or nutritional use. Huys G, Vancanneyt M, D'Haene K, Vankerckhoven V, Goossens H, Swings J. Res Microbiol; 2006 Nov 15; 157(9):803-10. PubMed ID: 16919915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs. Guo X, Li D, Lu W, Piao X, Chen X. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2006 Aug 15; 90(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 16820971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of species of the family Acetobacteraceae by AFLP DNA fingerprinting: Gluconacetobacter kombuchae is a later heterotypic synonym of Gluconacetobacter hansenii. Cleenwerck I, De Wachter M, González A, De Vuyst L, De Vos P. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2009 Jul 15; 59(Pt 7):1771-86. PubMed ID: 19542117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis supplementation of ewe's feed on sheep milk production and young lamb mortality. Kritas SK, Govaris A, Christodoulopoulos G, Burriel AR. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med; 2006 May 15; 53(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 16629949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety evaluation of two bacterial strains used in Asian probiotic products. Tompkins TA, Hagen KE, Wallace TD, Fillion-Forté V. Can J Microbiol; 2008 May 15; 54(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 18449224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bacillus subtilis and B. mojavensis strains connected to food poisoning produce the heat stable toxin amylosin. Apetroaie-Constantin C, Mikkola R, Andersson MA, Teplova V, Suominen I, Johansson T, Salkinoja-Salonen M. J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Jun 15; 106(6):1976-85. PubMed ID: 19228254 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Probiotics--possibilities and limitations of their application in food, animal feed, and in pharmaceutical preparations for men and animals]. Reuter G. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2001 Jun 15; 114(11-12):410-9. PubMed ID: 11766268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a group-specific PCR combined with ARDRA for the identification of Bacillus species of environmental significance. Wu XY, Walker MJ, Hornitzky M, Chin J. J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Jan 15; 64(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 15979744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Use of molecular methods in food microbiology with the example of probiotic use of lactobacilli]. Klein G. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003 Jan 15; 116(11-12):510-6. PubMed ID: 14655631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating amplification efficiency improves multiplex real-time PCR quantification of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis spores in animal feed. Jørgensen C, Leser TD. J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar 15; 68(3):588-95. PubMed ID: 17184861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Probiotic formulations and applications, the current probiotics market, and changes in the marketplace: a European perspective. Saxelin M. Clin Infect Dis; 2008 Feb 01; 46 Suppl 2():S76-9; discussion S144-51. PubMed ID: 18181728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of Bacillus spp. strains for use as probiotic additives in pig feed. Larsen N, Thorsen L, Kpikpi EN, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Cantor MD, Nielsen B, Brockmann E, Derkx PM, Jespersen L. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Feb 01; 98(3):1105-18. PubMed ID: 24201893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a strain-specific assay for detection of viable Lactobacillus sp. HOFG1 after application to cattle feed. Flint JF, Angert ER. J Microbiol Methods; 2005 May 01; 61(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 15722150 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular characterization of the probiotic strain Bacillus cereus var. toyoi NCIMB 40112 and differentiation from food poisoning strains. Klein G. J Food Prot; 2011 Jul 01; 74(7):1189-93. PubMed ID: 21740723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of mesophilic bacilli in faeces of feedlot cattle. Wu XY, Walker M, Vanselow B, Chao RL, Chin J. J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Mar 01; 102(3):872-9. PubMed ID: 17309638 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Description of Rummeliibacillus stabekisii gen. nov., sp. nov. and reclassification of Bacillus pycnus Nakamura et al. 2002 as Rummeliibacillus pycnus comb. nov. Vaishampayan P, Miyashita M, Ohnishi A, Satomi M, Rooney A, La Duc MT, Venkateswaran K. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2009 May 01; 59(Pt 5):1094-9. PubMed ID: 19406799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]