These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

164 related items for PubMed ID: 19063955

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 4. model development at low pulse rates: general model and application to individuals.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):15-30. PubMed ID: 19110049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
    Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
    Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian M.
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen LT, Saunders E, Richardson LM.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 43(6):346-55. PubMed ID: 15457817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study.
    van Weert S, Stokroos RJ, Rikers MM, van Dijk P.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Initial results from a model of ephaptic excitation in the electrically excited peripheral auditory nervous system.
    Jönsson R, Hanekom T, Hanekom JJ.
    Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):49-56. PubMed ID: 18255244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking.
    Cohen LT, Richardson LM, Saunders E, Cowan RS.
    Hear Res; 2003 May; 179(1-2):72-87. PubMed ID: 12742240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.