These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
230 related items for PubMed ID: 19068222
21. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search? Becker SI, Ansorge U, Horstmann G. Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing. Theeuwes J, Van der Stigchel S. Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Eye movements selective for spatial frequency and orientation during active visual search. Tavassoli A, Linde Iv, Bovik AC, Cormack LK. Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 18992270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of target foreknowledge on visual search for categorically separable orientation targets. Hodsoll JP, Humphreys GW. Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2346-51. PubMed ID: 15913702 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Visual search performance among persons with schizophrenia as a function of target eccentricity. Elahipanah A, Christensen BK, Reingold EM. Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 20230113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The contribution of low-level features at the centre of gaze to saccade target selection. Dorr M, Gegenfurtner KR, Barth E. Vision Res; 2009 Dec; 49(24):2918-26. PubMed ID: 19765602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Feature search in persons with severe visual impairment. Kuyk TK, Liu L, Fuhr PS. Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3224-34. PubMed ID: 16139858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. At first sight: a high-level pop out effect for faces. Hershler O, Hochstein S. Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1707-24. PubMed ID: 15792845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The relative contributions of luminance contrast and task demands on saccade target selection. Ludwig CJ, Gilchrist ID. Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2743-8. PubMed ID: 16580042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects. Foulsham T, Underwood G. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. More than just finding color: strategy in global visual search is shaped by learned target probabilities. Williams CC, Pollatsek A, Cave KR, Stroud MJ. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):688-99. PubMed ID: 19485685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Saccades and covert shifts of attention during active visual search: spatial distributions, memory, and items per fixation. Motter BC, Holsapple J. Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1261-81. PubMed ID: 17418364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Active search for multiple targets is inefficient. Verghese P. Vision Res; 2012 Dec 01; 74():61-71. PubMed ID: 22929812 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention. Lleras A, Levinthal BR, Kawahara J. Prog Brain Res; 2009 Dec 01; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions. Andrews LS, Watson DG, Humphreys GW, Braithwaite JJ. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug 01; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Lamy D, Antebi C, Aviani N, Carmel T. Vision Res; 2008 Jan 01; 48(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18054983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Greater frontal-parietal synchrony at low gamma-band frequencies for inefficient than efficient visual search in human EEG. Phillips S, Takeda Y. Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep 01; 73(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 19481120 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features. Le Meur O, Le Callet P, Barba D. Vision Res; 2007 Sep 01; 47(19):2483-98. PubMed ID: 17688904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The stage of priming: are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional? Becker SI. Vision Res; 2008 Feb 01; 48(5):664-84. PubMed ID: 18226831 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]