These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

584 related items for PubMed ID: 19077155

  • 1. Purely cancellous vs. corticocancellous bone in sinus floor augmentation with autogenous iliac crest: a prospective clinical trial.
    Gerressen M, Hermanns-Sachweh B, Riediger D, Hilgers RD, Spiekermann H, Ghassemi A.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 19077155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Calvarial versus iliac crest for autologous bone graft material for a sinus lift procedure: a histomorphometric study.
    Crespi R, Vinci R, Capparè P, Gherlone E, Romanos GE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Feb; 22(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 17929512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of platelet-rich plasma with autogenous bone graft for maxillary sinus augmentation in a rabbit model.
    Butterfield KJ, Bennett J, Gronowicz G, Adams D.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 15742289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report.
    Lee CY, Prasad HS, Suzuki JB, Stover JD, Rohrer MD.
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Stability of autogenous bone grafts after sinus lift procedures: a comparative study between anterior and posterior aspects of the iliac crest and an intraoral donor site.
    Thorwarth M, Srour S, Felszeghy E, Kessler P, Schultze-Mosgau S, Schlegel KA.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Sep; 100(3):278-84. PubMed ID: 16122653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting.
    Froum SJ, Wallace SS, Elian N, Cho SC, Tarnow DP.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 17243327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Platelet-rich plasma activity on maxillary sinus floor augmentation by autologous bone.
    Consolo U, Zaffe D, Bertoldi C, Ceccherelli G.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):252-62. PubMed ID: 17348891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Tibial versus iliac bone grafts: a comparative examination in 15 freshly preserved adult cadavers.
    Gerressen M, Prescher A, Riediger D, van der Ven D, Ghassemi A.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1270-5. PubMed ID: 19040442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
    Galindo-Moreno P, Avila G, Fernández-Barbero JE, Mesa F, O'Valle-Ravassa F, Wang HL.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report.
    Tolstunov L.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19615588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Histomorphometric analysis after maxillary sinus floor augmentation using cancellous bone-block allograft.
    Chaushu G, Vered M, Mardinger O, Nissan J.
    J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1147-52. PubMed ID: 20384463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Microscopic analysis of reconstructed maxillary alveolar ridges using autogenous bone grafts from the chin and iliac crest.
    Matsumoto MA, Filho HN, Francischone aE, Consolaro A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Aug; 17(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 12182293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation.
    John HD, Wenz B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Aug; 19(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 15101590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Are culture-expanded autogenous bone cells a clinically reliable option for sinus grafting?
    Fuerst G, Strbac GD, Vasak C, Tangl S, Leber J, Gahleitner A, Gruber R, Watzek G.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19077153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Tissue-engineered polymer-based periosteal bone grafts for maxillary sinus augmentation: five-year clinical results.
    Trautvetter W, Kaps C, Schmelzeisen R, Sauerbier S, Sittinger M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2753-62. PubMed ID: 21680073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsies harvested 11 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine and autogenous bone.
    Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):961-70. PubMed ID: 20497443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Maxillary sinus augmentation: histologic and histomorphometric analysis.
    Barone A, Crespi R, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Covani U.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005 Sep; 20(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 16161735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sinus graft with safescraper: 5-year results.
    Caubet J, Petzold C, Sáez-Torres C, Morey M, Iriarte JI, Sánchez J, Torres JJ, Ramis JM, Monjo M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 69(2):482-90. PubMed ID: 21238844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Bone quality after sinus floor augmentation].
    de Lange GL, Tadjoedin E, Bouw EA, Brouwer MC.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Jul; 104(7):271-3. PubMed ID: 11924408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.