These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

191 related items for PubMed ID: 19084205

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Rodger MA, Maser E, Stiell I, Howley HE, Wells PS.
    Thromb Res; 2005; 116(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 15907523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.
    Kabrhel C.
    J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment of pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department by physicians in training using the Wells model.
    Penaloza A, Mélot C, Dochy E, Blocklet D, Gevenois PA, Wautrecht JC, Lheureux P, Motte S.
    Thromb Res; 2007 Nov; 120(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17055556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Pretest risk assessment in suspected acute pulmonary embolism.
    Weiss CR, Haponik EF, Diette GB, Merriman B, Scatarige JC, Fishman EK.
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 18078902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Practical utility of clinical prediction rules for suspected acute pulmonary embolism in a large academic institution.
    Moores LK, Collen JF, Woods KM, Shorr AF.
    Thromb Res; 2004 Jan; 113(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15081559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
    Raja AS, Greenberg JO, Qaseem A, Denberg TD, Fitterman N, Schuur JD, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Nov 03; 163(9):701-11. PubMed ID: 26414967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, anno 2005.
    Michiels JJ, Hoogsteden H, Pattynama PM.
    Acta Chir Belg; 2005 Feb 03; 105(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15790199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of the clinical usefulness of two quantitative D-Dimer tests in patients with a low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
    Djurabi RK, Klok FA, Nijkeuter M, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, Kramer MH, Kruip MJ, Leebeek FW, Büller HR, Huisman MV.
    Thromb Res; 2009 Mar 03; 123(5):771-4. PubMed ID: 18814904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.