These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
368 related items for PubMed ID: 19088648
1. ProMIS augmented reality training of laparoscopic procedures face validity. Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19088648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Face validity study of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic suturing simulator. Botden SM, Berlage JT, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():26-32. PubMed ID: 18802880 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Preliminary study of virtual reality and model simulation for learning laparoscopic suturing skills. McDougall EM, Kolla SB, Santos RT, Gan JM, Box GN, Louie MK, Gamboa AJ, Kaplan AG, Moskowitz RM, Andrade LA, Skarecky DW, Osann KE, Clayman RV. J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19616797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. Panait L, Akkary E, Bell RL, Roberts KE, Dudrick SJ, Duffy AJ. J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality. Munz Y, Almoudaris AM, Moorthy K, Dosis A, Liddle AD, Darzi AW. Am J Surg; 2007 Jun; 193(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 17512295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Face-, expert, and referent validity of the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator. Schijven M, Jakimowicz J. Surg Endosc; 2002 Dec; 16(12):1764-70. PubMed ID: 12098029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Gallagher AG, Satava RM. Surg Endosc; 2002 Dec; 16(12):1746-52. PubMed ID: 12140641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Pearson AM, Gallagher AG, Rosser JC, Satava RM. Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 11961623 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does training novices to criteria and does rapid acquisition of skills on laparoscopic simulators have predictive validity or are we just playing video games? Hogle NJ, Widmann WD, Ude AO, Hardy MA, Fowler DL. J Surg Educ; 2008 Jan; 65(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 19059173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Designing and validating a customized virtual reality-based laparoscopic skills curriculum. Panait L, Bell RL, Roberts KE, Duffy AJ. J Surg Educ; 2008 Jan; 65(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 19059171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? Botden SM, Jakimowicz JJ. Surg Endosc; 2009 Aug; 23(8):1693-700. PubMed ID: 18813987 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills in interns using the MIST Virtual Reality Simulator: a prerequisite for those considering surgical training? Cope DH, Fenton-Lee D. ANZ J Surg; 2008 Apr; 78(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 18366403 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation. Botden SM, Torab F, Buzink SN, Jakimowicz JJ. Surg Endosc; 2008 May; 22(5):1214-22. PubMed ID: 17943369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlating virtual reality and box trainer tasks in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills. Newmark J, Dandolu V, Milner R, Grewal H, Harbison S, Hernandez E. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):546.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17980205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Face and construct validity of virtual reality simulation of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Schreuder HW, van Dongen KW, Roeleveld SJ, Schijven MP, Broeders IA. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 200(5):540.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19285646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills. Rosen J, Hannaford B, Richards CG, Sinanan MN. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 May; 48(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 11341532 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective evaluation of minimally invasive surgical skills for transplantation. Surgeons using a virtual reality simulator. Dănilă R, Gerdes B, Ulrike H, Domínguez Fernández E, Hassan I. Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009 May; 104(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 19499661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Training of basic laparoscopy skills on SimSurgery SEP. Buzink SN, Goossens RH, De Ridder H, Jakimowicz JJ. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2010 May; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 20095896 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hybrid augmented reality simulator: preliminary construct validation of laparoscopic smoothness in a urology residency program. Feifer A, Delisle J, Anidjar M. J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1455-9. PubMed ID: 18710760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]