These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

249 related items for PubMed ID: 19102502

  • 21. Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation.
    Yalti S, Gürbüz B, Sezer H, Celik S.
    Arch Androl; 2004; 50(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 15277001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique.
    Ricci G, Perticarari S, Boscolo R, Montico M, Guaschino S, Presani G.
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):632-8. PubMed ID: 18206147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination.
    Wainer R, Albert M, Dorion A, Bailly M, Bergère M, Lombroso R, Gombault M, Selva J.
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):2060-5. PubMed ID: 15243004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [A continuous-step density percoll gradient for use in AIH and life table analysis of pregnancy rates].
    Sato H, Kimura H, Saito S, Higuchi Y, Endo Y, Ohyama T, Yamaguchi M.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Feb; 42(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 2313143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Factors influencing successful rate of intrauterine insemination].
    Todorov P, Dimitrov I, Stamenov G, Todorov Ia, Kolarov G, Novachkov V.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003 Feb; 42(6):9-13. PubMed ID: 15067807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Intrauterine insemination with conjoint semen. How to increase the success rate?].
    Kdous M, Fadhlaoui A, Boubaker M, Youssef A, Chaker A, Ferchiou M, Zhioua F, Meriah S.
    Tunis Med; 2007 Sep; 85(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 18254311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Sperm-preparation techniques for men with normal and abnormal semen analysis. A comparison.
    Erel CT, Senturk LM, Irez T, Ercan L, Elter K, Colgar U, Ertungealp E.
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):917-22. PubMed ID: 11127104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Influence of sperm morphology on results of intrauterine insemination].
    Saucedo de la Llata E, Moraga Sánchez MR, Batiza Resendiz V, Galache Vega P, Santos Haliscak R, Hernández Ayup S.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2003 Sep; 71():455-9. PubMed ID: 14686057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Butt F, Chohan MA.
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination.
    Esmailzadeh S, Faramarzi M.
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):432-7. PubMed ID: 17434500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Relationship between processed total motile sperm count of husband or donor semen and pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination.
    Dong Fl, Sun Yp, Su Yc, Guo Yh, Hu Ll, Wang F.
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2011 Oct; 57(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 21864206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Impact of semen characteristics on the success of intrauterine insemination.
    Zhao Y, Vlahos N, Wyncott D, Petrella C, Garcia J, Zacur H, Wallach EE.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2004 May; 21(5):143-8. PubMed ID: 15279320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The effect of nasal oxytocin on pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination: double-blind, randomized, clinical pilot study.
    Ochsenkühn R, Pavlik R, Hecht S, von Schönfeldt V, Rogenhofer N, Thaler CJ.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Apr; 281(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 19921230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion and intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination: a prospective randomized study.
    Mamas L.
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):735-40. PubMed ID: 16500346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Effect of sperm treatment with exogenous platelet-activating factor on the outcome of intrauterine insemination.
    Grigoriou O, Makrakis E, Konidaris S, Hassiakos D, Papadias K, Baka S, Creatsas G.
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):618-21. PubMed ID: 15749490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study.
    Erdem A, Erdem M, Atmaca S, Guler I.
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2508-13. PubMed ID: 18692788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparative study on efficacy of three sperm-separation techniques.
    Xu L, Lu RK, Chen L, Zheng YL.
    Asian J Androl; 2000 Jun; 2(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 11232790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Optimization of artificial inseminations with donor semen: a four-year experience].
    Achard V, Perrin J, Saias-Magnan J, Noizet A, Grillo JM, Paulmyer-Lacroix O.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Nov; 33(11):877-83. PubMed ID: 16243575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography.
    Farhi J, Ben-Haroush A, Lande Y, Fisch B.
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):396-400. PubMed ID: 17445812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.