These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

503 related items for PubMed ID: 19105990

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices.
    Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19231572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices.
    Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Mar; 16(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 17362418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers.
    Sarafianou A, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Goula H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 22385694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A, Kaufmann-Jinoian V.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reliability of two color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color.
    Llena C, Lozano E, Amengual J, Forner L.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan 01; 12(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 22186685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation.
    Kanawati A, Richards MW.
    Gen Dent; 2009 Jan 01; 57(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19903610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shade-matching instrument.
    Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Dunford RG, Wee AG.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov 01; 98(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 18021823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Color comparison of two shade guides.
    Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Nov 01; 15(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 11887603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. New shade guide for tooth whitening monitoring: visual assessment.
    Paravina RD.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar 01; 99(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 18319088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods.
    Lasserre JF, Pop-Ciutrila IS, Colosi HA.
    J Dent; 2011 Dec 01; 39 Suppl 3():e29-36. PubMed ID: 22101123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluations of Repeatability and Accuracy of VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade-Matching Device.
    Knezović D, Zlatarić D, Illeš IŽ, Alajbeg M, Žagar.
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2015 Jun 01; 49(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 27688393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q, Yu H, Wang YN.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan 01; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.