These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 19110048

  • 1. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 19068227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 4. model development at low pulse rates: general model and application to individuals.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):15-30. PubMed ID: 19110049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
    Botros A, Psarros C.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF), from ECAP and FEA.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 19063955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Facilitation and refractoriness of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Hey M, Müller-Deile J, Hessel H, Killian M.
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():14-22. PubMed ID: 28947082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Morsnowski A, Charasse B, Collet L, Killian M, Müller-Deile J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006 Nov; 11(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 17008774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
    Ramekers D, Versnel H, Strahl SB, Klis SF, Grolman W.
    Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
    Xi X, Ji F, Han DY, Huang DL, Hong MD, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X, Ji F, Han D, Hong M, Chen A.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009 Dec; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
    Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian M.
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X, Hong MD, Han DY, Huang DL, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
    Yang H, Tang J, Cao K, Zhu X, Wang Y, Pan T.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
    He S, Shahsavarani BS, McFayden TC, Wang H, Gill KE, Xu L, Chao X, Luo J, Wang R, He N.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Oct; 39(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28678078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.