These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 19110048

  • 21. Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.
    Nourski KV, Abbas PJ, Miller CA, Robinson BK, Jeng FC.
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15811706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML, Laurello SA.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
    Dingemanse JG, Frijns JH, Briaire JJ.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Automatic analysis of auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential with an artificial neural network.
    Charasse B, Thai-Van H, Chanal JM, Berger-Vachon C, Collet L.
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 Jul; 31(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 15302088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Factors affecting predicted speech intelligibility with cochlear implants in an auditory model for electrical stimulation.
    Fredelake S, Hohmann V.
    Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):76-90. PubMed ID: 22465681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, Robinson BK.
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A, Baumann U.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar 30; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. An improved masker-probe method for stimulus artifact reduction in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldan C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Oct 30; 175(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18771694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.