These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


164 related items for PubMed ID: 19117170

  • 1. Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities.
    Frijns JH, Kalkman RK, Vanpoucke FJ, Bongers JS, Briaire JJ.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 129(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 19117170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA, Litvak LM, Hughes ML.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 12; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users.
    de Jong MAM, Briaire JJ, Biesheuvel JD, Snel-Bongers J, Böhringer S, Timp GRFM, Frijns JHM.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Jun 12; 41(5):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 31977727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Use of "phantom electrode" technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant.
    Saoji AA, Litvak LM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct 12; 31(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 20467321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea.
    Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Dekker DM, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2014 Sep 12; 315():10-24. PubMed ID: 24975087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R, Pesch J, Stöver T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz M, Lenarz T.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct 12; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, Litvak L.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug 12; 28(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 17667771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.