These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

410 related items for PubMed ID: 19121956

  • 21. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
    Asprino L, Consani S, de Moraes M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Mechanical and biomechanical measurements of five currently available osteosynthesis systems of self-tapping screws.
    Saka B.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 38(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 10783453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Biomechanical strength of the Peri-Loc proximal tibial plate: a comparison of all-locked versus hybrid locked/nonlocked screw configurations.
    Estes C, Rhee P, Shrader MW, Csavina K, Jacofsky MC, Jacofsky DJ.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 18448984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Fixation of zygomatic fractures with a biodegradable copolymer osteosynthesis system: short- and long-term results.
    Enislidis G, Lagogiannis G, Wittwer G, Glaser C, Ewers R.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 34(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 15617962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A prospective trial of poly-L-lactic/polyglycolic acid co-polymer plates and screws for internal fixation of mandibular fractures.
    Ferretti C.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 37(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 18295449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Biomechanical analysis of the percutaneous compression plate and sliding hip screw in intracapsular hip fractures: experimental assessment using synthetic and cadaver bones.
    Brandt E, Verdonschot N, van Vugt A, van Kampen A.
    Injury; 2006 Oct; 37(10):979-83. PubMed ID: 16934259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Dolanmaz D, Uckan S, Isik K, Saglam H.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Biomechanical considerations in plate osteosynthesis: the effect of plate-to-bone compression with and without angular screw stability.
    Stoffel K, Lorenz KU, Kuster MS.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jul; 21(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 17620993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Biomechanical testing of two devices for internal fixation of fractured ribs.
    Campbell N, Richardson M, Antippa P.
    J Trauma; 2010 May; 68(5):1234-8. PubMed ID: 20093978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis of the patella - an alternative to tension wiring?
    Wild M, Eichler C, Thelen S, Jungbluth P, Windolf J, Hakimi M.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 May; 25(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 20096491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid fractures.
    Moon JG, Zobitz ME, An KN, O'Driscoll SW.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Apr; 23(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 19318871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Inion biodegradable plates: the first century.
    Wood GD.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 44(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16203066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The comparative stability of screw versus plate versus screw and plate coronoid fixation.
    Budoff JE, Meyers DN, Ambrose CG.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Feb; 36(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 21276887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of stability of titanium and absorbable plate and screw fixation for mandibular angle fractures.
    Esen A, Ataoğlu H, Gemi L.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 18718777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Biomechanical comparison of different stabilisation devices for transforaminal sacral fracture. Is an interlocking device advantageous?].
    Culemann U, Seelig M, Lange U, Gänsslen A, Tosounidis G, Pohlemann T.
    Unfallchirurg; 2007 Jun; 110(6):528-36. PubMed ID: 17318310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Stripping torque as a predictor of successful internal fracture fixation.
    Edwards TR, Tevelen G, English H, Crawford R.
    ANZ J Surg; 2005 Dec; 75(12):1096-9. PubMed ID: 16398818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy with 2- versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA: part 3: inferior and anterior repositioning surgery.
    Erkmen E, Ataç MS, Yücel E, Kurt A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 38(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 19046852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Experimental evaluation of three osteosynthesis devices used for stabilizing condylar fractures of the mandible.
    Meyer C, Serhir L, Boutemi P.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 34(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 16537107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 1 week of maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.
    Chritah A, Lazow SK, Berger JR.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1737-41. PubMed ID: 16297694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.