These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

479 related items for PubMed ID: 19124036

  • 1. On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry.
    Baker DH, Graf EW.
    Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 19124036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.
    O'Shea RP, Parker A, La Rooy D, Alais D.
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics.
    van Boxtel JJ, van Ee R, Erkelens CJ.
    J Vis; 2007 Nov 21; 7(14):3.1-11. PubMed ID: 18217798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants.
    Brown RJ, Candy TR, Norcia AM.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Dec 21; 40(13):3324-33. PubMed ID: 10586959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Binocular contrast interactions: dichoptic masking is not a single process.
    Baker DH, Meese TS.
    Vision Res; 2007 Nov 21; 47(24):3096-107. PubMed ID: 17904610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision.
    Baker DH, Meese TS, Summers RJ.
    Neuroscience; 2007 Apr 25; 146(1):435-48. PubMed ID: 17346895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Importance of phase alignment for interocular suppression.
    Maehara G, Huang PC, Hess RF.
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul 25; 49(14):1838-47. PubMed ID: 19401207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry.
    Takase S, Yukumatsu S, Bingushi K.
    Vision Res; 2008 Aug 25; 48(17):1798-803. PubMed ID: 18585751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specific components of rivalry suppression.
    Stuit SM, Cass J, Paffen CL, Alais D.
    J Vis; 2009 Oct 16; 9(11):17.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: implications for binocular vision and visual awareness.
    Macknik SL, Martinez-Conde S.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Oct 16; 16(6):1049-59. PubMed ID: 15298791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L.
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun 16; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry.
    Kamphuisen AP, van Wezel RJ, van Ee R.
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr 16; 47(9):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17360017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Functional hierarchies of nonconscious visual processing.
    Breitmeyer BG, Koç A, Oğmen H, Ziegler R.
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun 16; 48(14):1509-13. PubMed ID: 18511097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Breaking camouflage: binocular disparity reduces contrast masking in natural images.
    Wardle SG, Cass J, Brooks KR, Alais D.
    J Vis; 2010 Dec 31; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21196512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A common contrast pooling rule for suppression within and between the eyes.
    Meese TS, Challinor KL, Summers RJ.
    Vis Neurosci; 2008 Dec 31; 25(4):585-601. PubMed ID: 18764960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of transient versus sustained activation on interocular suppression.
    Nichols DF, Wilson HR.
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan 31; 49(1):102-14. PubMed ID: 18992272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation.
    Baker DH, Meese TS, Hess RF.
    Vision Res; 2008 Jul 31; 48(15):1625-40. PubMed ID: 18547600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
    Lee SH, Blake R.
    Vision Res; 2004 May 31; 44(10):983-91. PubMed ID: 15031091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A bias for looming stimuli to predominate in binocular rivalry.
    Parker A, Alais D.
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep 31; 47(20):2661-74. PubMed ID: 17707453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression.
    Watanabe K, Paik Y, Blake R.
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec 31; 44(26):3065-71. PubMed ID: 15474579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.