These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


458 related items for PubMed ID: 19132208

  • 1. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
    Douma RA, Gibson NS, Gerdes VE, Büller HR, Wells PS, Perrier A, Le Gal G.
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.
    Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J.
    Thromb Haemost; 2000 Mar; 83(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 10744147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.
    van Es J, Mos I, Douma R, Erkens P, Durian M, Nizet T, van Houten A, Hofstee H, ten Cate H, Ullmann E, Büller H, Huisman M, Kamphuisen PW.
    Thromb Haemost; 2012 Jan; 107(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 22072293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.
    Kabrhel C.
    J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of the clinical usefulness of two quantitative D-Dimer tests in patients with a low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
    Djurabi RK, Klok FA, Nijkeuter M, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, Kramer MH, Kruip MJ, Leebeek FW, Büller HR, Huisman MV.
    Thromb Res; 2009 Mar; 123(5):771-4. PubMed ID: 18814904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Exclusion of venous thromboembolism: evaluation of D-Dimer PLUS for the quantitative determination of D-dimer.
    Vermeer HJ, Ypma P, van Strijen MJ, Muradin AA, Hudig F, Jansen RW, Wijermans PW, Gerrits WB.
    Thromb Res; 2005 Mar; 115(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 15733971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A simple diagnostic strategy in hospitalized patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Kruip MJ, Söhne M, Nijkeuter M, Kwakkel-Van Erp HM, Tick LW, Halkes SJ, Prins MH, Kramer MH, Huisman MV, Büller HR, Leebeek FW, Christopher Study Investigators.
    J Intern Med; 2006 Nov; 260(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 17040252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Further validation and simplification of the Wells clinical decision rule in pulmonary embolism.
    Gibson NS, Sohne M, Kruip MJ, Tick LW, Gerdes VE, Bossuyt PM, Wells PS, Buller HR, Christopher study investigators.
    Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jan; 99(1):229-34. PubMed ID: 18217159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.