These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1204 related items for PubMed ID: 19133949

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H, Cehreli MC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
    Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, Pinés-Hueso J, deLlanos-Lanchares H, del Rio Highsmith J.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I, Block L, Lehr Z, Ormianer Z, Matalon S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G, Okamura M, Muñoz CA.
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F, Savabi O, Shahtoosi M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P, Pujari M, Prithviraj DR, Khare S.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW, Duncan J, Afshar M, Moshaverinia A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 61.