These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1013 related items for PubMed ID: 19138455

  • 1. Effect of cochlear implant electrode insertion on middle-ear function as measured by intra-operative laser Doppler vibrometry.
    Donnelly N, Bibas A, Jiang D, Bamiou DE, Santulli C, Jeronimidis G, Fitzgerald O'Connor A.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 19138455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The influence of a cochlear implant electrode on the mechanical function of the inner ear.
    Huber AM, Hoon SJ, Sharouz B, Daniel B, Albrecht E.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 20061991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Matusiak M, Porowski M, Skarzynski PH, James CJ.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012 Aug; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Electrocochleographic and mechanical assessment of round window stimulation with an active middle ear prosthesis.
    Koka K, Holland NJ, Lupo JE, Jenkins HA, Tollin DJ.
    Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 19720125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Multichannel cochlear implantation in the scala vestibuli.
    Lin K, Marrinan MS, Waltzman SB, Roland JT.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 16788421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cochlear Implant Electrode Effect on Sound Energy Transfer Within the Cochlea During Acoustic Stimulation.
    Greene NT, Mattingly JK, Jenkins HA, Tollin DJ, Easter JR, Cass SP.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1554-61. PubMed ID: 26333018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The internal dimensions of the cochlear scalae with special reference to cochlear electrode insertion trauma.
    Biedron S, Prescher A, Ilgner J, Westhofen M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 20142798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Indications for middle ear obliteration within the scope of cochlear implant management].
    Issing PR, Schönermark M, Kempf HG, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):727-31. PubMed ID: 9081277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The role of preoperative, intratympanic glucocorticoids for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: a prospective clinical study.
    Rajan GP, Kuthubutheen J, Hedne N, Krishnaswamy J.
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jan; 122(1):190-5. PubMed ID: 22183635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.
    Häusler R, Stieger C, Bernhard H, Kompis M.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Jan; 13(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 18259077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intact meatal skin, canal wall down approach for difficult cochlear implantation.
    Carfrae MJ, Foyt D.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Aug; 123(8):903-6. PubMed ID: 18976512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC, Reitzen SD, Marrinan MS, Waltzman SB, Roland JT.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level, low frequency sounds.
    Greene NT, Jenkins HA, Tollin DJ, Easter JR.
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():16-30. PubMed ID: 28189837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
    Neumann M, Aschendorff A, Schipper J, Laszig R, Klenzner T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques.
    Berrettini S, Forli F, Passetti S.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Mar; 122(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 17666134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation.
    Di Nardo W, Cantore I, Cianfrone F, Melillo P, Rigante M, Paludetti G.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007 Mar; 12(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 17259703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Third-window vibroplasty with an active middle ear implant: assessment of physiologic responses in a model of stapes fixation in Chinchilla lanigera.
    Lupo JE, Koka K, Jenkins HA, Tollin DJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 22334156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 51.