These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

614 related items for PubMed ID: 19138616

  • 1. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
    Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA.
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL.
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy evaluation of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in zygomatic implant placement in human cadavers.
    Chrcanovic BR, Oliveira DR, Custódio AL.
    J Oral Implantol; 2010 Apr; 36(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 20545538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T.
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template.
    Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Calasso S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Jan; 27(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 22616060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report.
    Stumpel LJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 20156227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
    D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Application and success of two stereolithographic surgical guide systems for implant placement with immediate loading.
    Abboud M, Wahl G, Calvo-Guirado JL, Orentlicher G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Apr; 27(3):634-43. PubMed ID: 22616058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
    Ozan O, Orhan K, Turkyilmaz I.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21959426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Apr; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems.
    Soares MM, Harari ND, Cardoso ES, Manso MC, Conz MB, Vidigal GM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Apr; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
    Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003 Apr; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study.
    Chen X, Yuan J, Wang C, Huang Y, Kang L.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement. Part II: reliability of mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides.
    Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Pişkin B, Özdemir T.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 22235792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept.
    Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF.
    J Prosthodont; 2006 Dec; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16433652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques.
    Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):980-8. PubMed ID: 20497439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
    Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, Cannas B, Fäldt J, Söderberg R, Näsström K.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.