These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

73 related items for PubMed ID: 1913887

  • 1. [The Pulsair manual noncontact tonometer].
    Bartos D, Skopový M.
    Cesk Oftalmol; 1991 Feb; 47(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 1913887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC, Almubrad TM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18174841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer.
    Lawson-Kopp W, DeJong A, Yudcovitch L, Williams S, Kohl P, Yolton RL.
    Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 12365714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement using a noncontact Keeler tonometer].
    Korynta J, Dvorák J.
    Cesk Oftalmol; 1991 Nov; 47(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 1364657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Keeler Pulsair tonometer.
    Evans K, Wishart PK.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 1454364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Mackie SW, Jay JL, Ackerley R, Walsh G.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8762780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M, Hoffmann OF.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Keeler Pulsair air impulse tonometer. Comparison with the Perkins hand-held applanation tonometer for peri-operative measurement of intra-ocular pressure.
    Bricker SR, McGalliard JN, Mostafa SM.
    Anaesthesia; 1990 Jan; 45(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 2316837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer in the measurement of intraocular pressure in dogs and cats.
    Andrade SF, Cremonezi T, Zachi CA, Lonchiati CF, Amatuzzi JD, Sakamoto KP, Mello PA.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 12(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 19751486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
    García-Resúa C, González-Meijome JM, Gilino J, Yebra-Pimentel E.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration.
    Atkinson PL, Wishart PK, James JN, Vernon SA, Reid F.
    Eye (Lond); 1992 Feb; 6 ( Pt 5)():530-4. PubMed ID: 1286721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Cho P, Lui T.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 74(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 9148267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ, Thompson JR, Deutsch J, Misson GP, Naylor G, Tan-Yee A, Taylor RH, Fielder AR.
    Eye (Lond); 1993 Jan; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of five portable tonometers.
    Wingert TA, Bassi CJ, McAlister WH, Galanis JC.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):670-4. PubMed ID: 8576531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Intra-eye pressure range and pulse profiles in normals with the Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Vernon SA.
    Eye (Lond); 1993 Nov; 7 ( Pt 1)():134-7. PubMed ID: 8325403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Personal experience with non-contact tonometry in children].
    Filous A, Malec J, Burdová M.
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1998 May; 54(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 9721477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer.
    Naruse S, Mori K, Kinoshita S.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers.
    Kóthy P, Nagymihály A, Holló G.
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Jan; 9(1):PI1-4. PubMed ID: 12552251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Estimation of intraocular pressure in rabbits using noncontact tonometer: a comparative evaluation with Schiotz tonometer.
    Gupta SK, Saxena R, Agarwal R, Galpalli ND, Srivastava S, Agrawal SS.
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Jan; 29(6):405-9. PubMed ID: 17922069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reliability of the Nidek NT-1000 non contact tonometer.
    Van de Velde T, Zeyen T.
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1995 Jan; 255():19-22. PubMed ID: 7496571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.