These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

966 related items for PubMed ID: 19141046

  • 21. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q, Yu H, Wang YN.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N, Helling S, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The use of objective digital matching to achieve an esthetic composite restoration.
    Jarad FD, Albadri SS, Mair LH.
    J Clin Dent; 2008 Jun; 19(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18500153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Shade distribution of commercial resin composites and color difference with shade guide tabs.
    Park SK, Lee YK.
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 17993033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources.
    Curd FM, Jasinevicius TR, Graves A, Cox V, Sadan A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 17174655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, Borbely J, Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, Renault P, Corcodel N, Pohlen B, Marada G, de Parga JA, Reshad M, Klinke TU, Hannak WB, Paravina RD.
    J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D, Şermet B, Balkaya MC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices.
    Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19231572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Color comparison of VITA shade guide and metal ceramic restoration].
    Yang H, Sun J, Wang Z.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 May; 17(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 12539711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M, Chadwick RG.
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec 09; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD, Park SE, Weber HP, Ishikawa-Nagai S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May 09; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. New shade guide for evaluation of tooth whitening--colorimetric study.
    Paravina RD, Johnston WM, Powers JM.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007 May 09; 19(5):276-83; discussion 283. PubMed ID: 17877628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effects of shade tab arrangement on the repeatability and accuracy of shade selection.
    Yılmaz B, Yuzugullu B, Cınar D, Berksun S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun 09; 105(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 21640239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs.
    Kim JG, Yu B, Lee YK.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb 09; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students.
    Jaju RA, Nagai S, Karimbux N, Da Silva JD.
    J Dent Educ; 2010 Sep 09; 74(9):1002-10. PubMed ID: 20837742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Dental shade matching using a digital camera.
    Tam WK, Lee HJ.
    J Dent; 2012 Dec 09; 40 Suppl 2():e3-10. PubMed ID: 22713739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Shade distribution of indirect resin composites compared with a shade guide.
    Kim BJ, Yu B, Lee YK.
    J Dent; 2008 Dec 09; 36(12):1054-60. PubMed ID: 18930576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Application of digital imaging in tooth whitening randomized controlled trials.
    Sagel PA, Gerlach RW.
    Am J Dent; 2007 Sep 09; 20 Spec No A():7A-14A. PubMed ID: 19681252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 49.