These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1064 related items for PubMed ID: 19141815

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Gene and antigen markers of shiga-toxin producing E. coli from Michigan and Indiana river water: occurrence and relation to recreational water quality criteria.
    Duris JW, Haack SK, Fogarty LR.
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(5):1878-86. PubMed ID: 19643753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence.
    Stoeckel DM, Stelzer EA, Stogner RW, Mau DP.
    Water Res; 2011 May; 45(10):3225-44. PubMed ID: 21513966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
    Sanders BF, Arega F, Sutula M.
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed.
    Fremaux B, Gritzfeld J, Boa T, Yost CK.
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4838-49. PubMed ID: 19604534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Persistence of pharmaceutical compounds and other organic wastewater contaminants in a conventional drinking-water-treatment plant.
    Stackelberg PE, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Zaugg SD, Henderson AK, Reissman DB.
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Aug 15; 329(1-3):99-113. PubMed ID: 15262161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacterial indicator response for ocean recreational water quality testing.
    Noble RT, Moore DF, Leecaster MK, McGee CD, Weisberg SB.
    Water Res; 2003 Apr 15; 37(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 12600392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Addressing uncertainty in fecal indicator bacteria dark inactivation rates.
    Gronewold AD, Myers L, Swall JL, Noble RT.
    Water Res; 2011 Jan 15; 45(2):652-64. PubMed ID: 20843534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Ecological control of fecal indicator bacteria in an urban stream.
    Surbeck CQ, Jiang SC, Grant SB.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan 15; 44(2):631-7. PubMed ID: 20028091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Groundwater microbiological quality in Canadian drinking water municipal wells.
    Locas A, Barthe C, Margolin AB, Payment P.
    Can J Microbiol; 2008 Jun 15; 54(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 18535633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Enterococci vs coliforms as a possible fecal contamination indicator: baseline data for Karachi.
    Hussain M, Rasool SA, Khan MT, Wajid A.
    Pak J Pharm Sci; 2007 Apr 15; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17416563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 54.