These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 19145007

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB.
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Memory Errors in Alibi Generation: How an Alibi Can Turn Against Us.
    Crozier WE, Strange D, Loftus EF.
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 28165152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.
    Gronlund SD, Carlson CA, Dailey SB, Goodsell CA.
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):140-152. PubMed ID: 19586253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification.
    Gepshtein S, Wang Y, He F, Diep D, Albright TD.
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul 14; 11(1):3380. PubMed ID: 32665586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An expected cost model of eyewitness identification.
    Yang Y, Smalarz L, Moody SA, Cabell JJ, Copp CJ.
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun 14; 43(3):205-219. PubMed ID: 31045389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.
    Cohen AL, Starns JJ, Rotello CM, Cataldo AM.
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May 13; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures and the Supreme Court's reliability test in light of eyewitness science: 30 years later.
    Wells GL, Quinlivan DS.
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb 13; 33(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 18302010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory.
    Wixted JT, Mickes L, Fisher RP.
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 May 13; 13(3):324-335. PubMed ID: 29716454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt.
    Price HL, Bruer KC, Adkins MC.
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun 13; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.