These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 19146019

  • 1. Clinical application of a stereolithographic surgical guide for simple positioning of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Kim SH, Kang JM, Choi B, Nelson G.
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 19146019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim SH, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Chung KR, Kook YA, Nelson G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S82-9. PubMed ID: 17448391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
    Kalra S, Tripathi T, Rai P, Kanase A.
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov 18; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accurate pre-surgical determination for self-drilling miniscrew implant placement using surgical guides and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Miyazawa K, Kawaguchi M, Tabuchi M, Goto S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec 18; 32(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 20413451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Precise insertion of orthodontic miniscrews with a stereolithographic surgical guide based on cone beam computed tomography data: a pilot study.
    Morea C, Hayek JE, Oleskovicz C, Dominguez GC, Chilvarquer I.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Dec 18; 26(4):860-5. PubMed ID: 21841996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep 18; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Root proximity and inclination of orthodontic mini-implants after placement: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation.
    Shinohara A, Motoyoshi M, Uchida Y, Shimizu N.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul 18; 144(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 23810045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim SH, Yoon HG, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Kook YA, Nelson G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May 18; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G, Hart A, Cheretakis C, Goodmurphy C, Trexler S, McGary C, Retrouvey JM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep 18; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical applications of mini-implants as orthodontic anchorage and the peri-implant tissue reaction upon loading.
    Cho HJ.
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2006 Oct 18; 34(10):813-20. PubMed ID: 17087396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Yu JJ, Kim GT, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Paek J, Kim SH, Huang JC.
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar 18; 82(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 21875317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
    Landin M, Jadhav A, Yadav S, Tadinada A.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May 18; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. AUSOM: a 3D placement guide for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Al-Suleiman M, Shehadah M.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011 May 18; 12(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 21789288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bone density at interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Chun YS, Lim WH.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb 18; 12(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 19154272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr 18; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure?
    Kim SH, Kang SM, Choi YS, Kook YA, Chung KR, Huang JC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep 18; 138(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 20816295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!
    Romano FL, Consolaro A.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Sep 18; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25741821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Digital design of a surgical guide for placement of definitive implants before orthodontic treatment.
    Bayraktaroglu HC, Kim JS, Londono J, Baker PS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug 18; 114(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 25935081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults.
    Baumgaertel S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec 18; 140(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 22133945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography.
    Alves M, Baratieri C, Nojima LI.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct 18; 22(10):1151-1156. PubMed ID: 21303419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.