These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

407 related items for PubMed ID: 19153197

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M, Gunnarsson M.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N, Elmore A.
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs).
    McGarry CK, Grattan MW, Cosgrove VP.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec 07; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Exact calculation of the minimal exposure for the secure detection of a transmission contrast signal.
    Schöfer FH, Hoeschen C.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec 07; 139(1-3):81-5. PubMed ID: 20185455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fluoroscopic image quality in the film and filmless eras: a standardized comparison performed in coronary interventional facilities.
    Laskey W, Wondrow M, Chambers C.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Mar 07; 58(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 12594708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
    Toroi P, Nieminen MT, Tenkanen-Rautakoski P, Varjonen M.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun 21; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.