These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Objective analysis of contact lens fit. Belda-Salmerón L, Drew T, Hall L, Wolffsohn JS. Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Jun; 38(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 25726510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How should initial fit inform soft contact lens prescribing. Boychev N, Laughton DS, Bharwani G, Ghuman H, Wolffsohn JS. Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Jun; 39(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 26778151 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal topography and soft contact lens fit. Young G, Schnider C, Hunt C, Efron S. Optom Vis Sci; 2010 May; 87(5):358-66. PubMed ID: 20386354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical investigation of the base curve and comfort rate of a new prototype silicone hydrogel contact lens. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Rubido-Crespo MJ. Eye Contact Lens; 2008 May; 34(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 18463479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In-eye performance of soft contact lenses made from different materials. Tranoudis I, Efron N. Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2004 Sep; 27(3):133-48. PubMed ID: 16303536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of end of day silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lens fit on ocular comfort, physiology and lens wettability. Wolffsohn J, Hall L, Mroczkowska S, Hunt OA, Bilkhu P, Drew T, Sheppard A. Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 25911987 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of corneoscleral topography on soft contact lens fit. Hall LA, Young G, Wolffsohn JS, Riley C. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Aug 29; 52(9):6801-6. PubMed ID: 21685339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Consensus on recording of gas permeable contact lens fit. Wolffsohn JS, van der Worp E, de Brabander J, GP Consensus Group. Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Dec 29; 36(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 23538149 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of soft contact lens fitting characteristics. Young G. Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Apr 29; 73(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 8728492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact lens fitting profile in Portugal in 2005: strategies for first fits and refits. González-Méijome JM, Jorge J, Almeida JB, Parafita MA. Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar 29; 33(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 17496700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Blinking patterns and corneal staining. Collins MJ, Iskander DR, Saunders A, Hook S, Anthony E, Gillon R. Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec 29; 32(6):287-93. PubMed ID: 17099390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses. Efron S, Efron N, Morgan PB. Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar 29; 85(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18317336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of soft contact lens edge design and midperipheral lens shape on the epithelium and its indentation with lens mobility. Wolffsohn JS, Drew T, Dhallu S, Sheppard A, Hofmann GJ, Prince M. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Sep 11; 54(9):6190-7. PubMed ID: 23942975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tear film surface quality with soft contact lenses using dynamic-area high-speed videokeratoscopy. Alonso-Caneiro D, Iskander DR, Collins MJ. Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep 11; 35(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 19657279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of hydrogel lens settling on the thickness of the tears and contact lens. Nichols JJ, King-Smith PE. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Aug 11; 45(8):2549-54. PubMed ID: 15277476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]