These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
415 related items for PubMed ID: 19168639
1. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Boer DP, Eher R. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL, Lalumière ML, Boer D, Lang C. Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: what is next? Hempel I, Buck N, Cima M, van Marle H. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Feb; 57(2):208-28. PubMed ID: 22147101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk assessment in offenders with intellectual disability: a comparison across three levels of security. Lindsay WR, Hogue TE, Taylor JL, Steptoe L, Mooney P, O'Brien G, Johnston S, Smith AH. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):90-111. PubMed ID: 18174529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide. Kingston DA, Yates PM, Firestone P, Babchishin K, Bradford JM. Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does consideration of psychopathy and sexual deviance add to the predictive validity of the static-99R? Looman J, Morphett NA, Abracen J. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Aug; 57(8):939-65. PubMed ID: 22641857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. Bartosh DL, Garby T, Lewis D, Gray S. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Aug; 47(4):422-38. PubMed ID: 12971183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Violent and sexual offences: a validation of the predictive quality of the PCL:SV in Switzerland. Urbaniok F, Endrass J, Rossegger A, Noll T. Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 30(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17134754 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Strengths and limitations of actuarial prediction of criminal reoffence in a German prison sample: a comparative study of LSI-R, HCR-20 and PCL-R. Dahle KP. Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006 Aug; 29(5):431-42. PubMed ID: 16780950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments. Smid WJ, Kamphuis JH, Wever EC, Van Beek DJ. Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 24773035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A practical guide for the evaluation of sexual recidivism risk in mentally retarded sex offenders. Phenix A, Sreenivasan S. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009 Sep; 37(4):509-24. PubMed ID: 20018999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A time series modeling approach in risk appraisal of violent and sexual recidivism. Bani-Yaghoub M, Fedoroff JP, Curry S, Amundsen DE. Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):349-66. PubMed ID: 19399599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments. Wollert R, Cramer E, Waggoner J, Skelton A, Vess J. Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):471-90. PubMed ID: 21098823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Actuarial prediction of violent recidivism in mentally disordered offenders. Snowden RJ, Gray NS, Taylor J, MacCulloch MJ. Psychol Med; 2007 Nov; 37(11):1539-49. PubMed ID: 17537287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting recidivism with the Personality Assessment Inventory in a sample of sex offenders screened for civil commitment as sexually violent predators. Boccaccini MT, Murrie DC, Hawes SW, Simpler A, Johnson J. Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 20230160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) to predict in-prison aggressive behavior in a Swiss offender population. Endrass J, Rossegger A, Frischknecht A, Noll T, Urbaniok F. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 17615429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Criminal recidivism in sexual homicide perpetrators. Hill A, Habermann N, Klusmann D, Berner W, Briken P. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 17954927 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Recidivism risk assessment in sex offenders]. Pérez Ramírez M, Redondo Illescas S, Martínez García M, García Forero C, Andrés Pueyo A. Psicothema; 2008 May; 20(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18413079 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A dynamic assessment of offender risk, needs, and strengths in a sample of pre-release general offenders. Miller HA. Behav Sci Law; 2006 May; 24(6):767-82. PubMed ID: 17171765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Substance abuse among high-risk sexual offenders: do measures of lifetime history of substance abuse add to the prediction of recidivism over actuarial risk assessment instruments? Looman J, Abracen J. J Interpers Violence; 2011 Mar; 26(4):683-700. PubMed ID: 20587448 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]