These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

854 related items for PubMed ID: 19169990

  • 1. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P, Steiner M, Attmann T, Pfister G, Cremer J, Lutter G.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM, Zhou JY, Hu SS, Cui JW, Song YH, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Yuan WM, Song XY.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul 29; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Bottio T.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May 29; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses.
    Walker PG, Yoganathan AP.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992 May 29; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves.
    Reul H, van Son JA, Steinseifer U, Schmitz B, Schmidt A, Schmitz C, Rau G.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep 29; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In-vitro testing of three totally supra-annular bileaflet mechanical valves: hydrodynamics in the Sheffield pulse duplicator.
    Bottio T, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Gerosa G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar 29; 17(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 18512495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ, Eichinger WB, Hettich IM, Bleiziffer S, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul 29; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch.
    Azadani AN, Jaussaud N, Matthews PB, Chuter TA, Ge L, Guy TS, Guccione J, Tseng EE.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul 29; 18(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19852139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM, Butterfield M, Walker PG, Watterson KG, Fisher J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar 29; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Aortic valve hydrodynamics: considerations on the absence of sinuses of Valsalva.
    Bottio T, Buratto E, Dal Lin C, Lika A, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Gerosa G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov 29; 21(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 23409351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.
    Cox JL, Ad N, Myers K, Gharib M, Quijano RC.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug 29; 130(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 16077422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The 20 mm Medtronic Hall prosthesis in the small aortic root.
    Aris A, Ramirez I, Camara ML, Carreras F, Borras X, Pons-Llado G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jul 29; 5(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 8858514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. In vitro pulsatile flow evaluation of a stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
    Sung HW, Le TN, Kingsbury CJ, Quintero LJ, Myers KE, Quijano RC.
    ASAIO J; 1995 Jul 29; 41(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7727828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J, Sievers HH, Misfeld M, Runge M, Vogt PR, Scharfschwerdt M.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep 29; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vitro study of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: selection of a tissue valve.
    Flecher EM, Curry JW, Joudinaud TM, Saber H, MacNett J, Ahlin A, Weber PA, Duran CM.
    J Card Surg; 2008 Sep 29; 23(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 18435638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Indication of cavitation in mechanical heart valve patients.
    Andersen TS, Johansen P, Paulsen PK, Nygaard H, Hasenkam JM.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov 29; 12(6):790-6. PubMed ID: 14658822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve prostheses at high flow rates.
    Gabbay S, McQueen DM, Yellin EL, Becker RM, Frater RW.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Dec 29; 76(6):771-87. PubMed ID: 713584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Medtronic-Hall valve: a design in 1977 to improve the results of valve replacement.
    Hall KV.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992 Dec 29; 6 Suppl 1():S64-7. PubMed ID: 1389282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position.
    Hartrumpf M, Kuehnel RU, Puchner R, Wendt MO, Pohl M, Albes JM.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct 29; 53(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 16208612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A new self-expanding aortic stent valve with annular fixation: in vitro haemodynamic assessment.
    Vergnat M, Henaine R, Kalejs M, Bommeli S, Ferrari E, Obadia JF, Von Segesser LK.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jun 29; 35(6):970-5; discussion 975-6. PubMed ID: 19409805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 43.