These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1308 related items for PubMed ID: 19190428

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Kinetic analysis of the cervical spinal cord in patients after spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique.
    Miyata K, Marui T, Miura J, Yoshiya S, Fujii M, Kurosaka M, Doita M.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep 01; 31(19):E690-7. PubMed ID: 16946642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome.
    Houten JK, Cooper PR.
    Neurosurgery; 2003 May 01; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Zhang YZ, Shen Y, Wang LF, Ding WY, Xu JX, He J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May 01; 35(10):E396-9. PubMed ID: 20393392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Selective laminoplasty after the preoperative diagnosis of the responsible level using spinal cord evoked potentials in elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary report.
    Kato Y, Kojima T, Kataoka H, Imajo Y, Yara T, Yoshida Y, Imagama T, Taguchi T.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec 01; 22(8):586-92. PubMed ID: 19956033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The clinical usefulness of preoperative dynamic MRI to select decompression levels for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Harada T, Tsuji Y, Mikami Y, Hatta Y, Sakamoto A, Ikeda T, Tamai K, Hase H, Kubo T.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul 01; 28(6):820-5. PubMed ID: 20418043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty.
    Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, Nakamura M, Ikegami T.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec 15; 28(24):2667-72. PubMed ID: 14673367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours after cervical laminoplasty.
    Shiozaki T, Otsuka H, Nakata Y, Yokoyama T, Takeuchi K, Ono A, Numasawa T, Wada K, Toh S.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb 01; 34(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 19179922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Alafifi T, Kern R, Fehlings M.
    J Neuroimaging; 2007 Oct 01; 17(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 17894620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Modified K-line in magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinical outcome in patients with nonlordotic alignment after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Taniyama T, Hirai T, Yoshii T, Yamada T, Yasuda H, Saito M, Inose H, Kato T, Kawabata S, Okawa A.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct 01; 39(21):E1261-8. PubMed ID: 25077905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Avadhani A, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP.
    Spine J; 2010 Jun 01; 10(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 20494809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 19 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoğlu T, Ozer AF.
    Turk Neurosurg; 2009 Apr 01; 19(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 19431120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun 15; 28(12):1258-62. PubMed ID: 12811268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
    Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M, Mochizuki M, Moriya H.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb 15; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Investigation of motor dominant C5 paralysis after laminoplasty from the results of evoked spinal cord responses.
    Kaneko K, Hashiguchi A, Kato Y, Kojima T, Imajyo Y, Taguchi T.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jul 15; 19(5):358-61. PubMed ID: 16826009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prospective cohort study of mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy without surgical treatment.
    Sumi M, Miyamoto H, Suzuki T, Kaneyama S, Kanatani T, Uno K.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan 15; 16(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21981274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Do quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters correlate with the clinical presentation and functional outcomes after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A prospective multicenter study.
    Karpova A, Arun R, Kalsi-Ryan S, Massicotte EM, Kopjar B, Fehlings MG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug 15; 39(18):1488-97. PubMed ID: 24859570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 66.