These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

616 related items for PubMed ID: 19190827

  • 1. Point-of-care versus central laboratory coagulation testing during haemorrhagic surgery. A multicenter study.
    Toulon P, Ozier Y, Ankri A, Fléron MH, Leroux G, Samama CM.
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 Feb; 101(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19190827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Is perioperative point-of-care prothrombin time testing accurate compared to the standard laboratory test?
    Urwyler N, Staub LP, Beran D, Deplazes M, Lord SJ, Alberio L, Theiler L, Greif R.
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 Oct; 102(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 19806266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing: an economic analysis in an academic medical center.
    Tsai WW, Nash DB, Seamonds B, Weir GJ.
    Clin Ther; 1994 Oct; 16(5):898-910; discussion 854. PubMed ID: 7859247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of a point-of-care coagulation analyzer on patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.
    Chavez JJ, Weatherall JS, Strevels SM, Liu F, Snider CC, Carroll RC.
    J Clin Anesth; 2004 Feb; 16(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 14984853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
    Plesch W, Wolf T, Breitenbeck N, Dikkeschei LD, Cervero A, Perez PL, van den Besselaar AM.
    Thromb Res; 2008 Feb; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Point of care and central laboratory determinations of the aPTT are not interchangeable in surgical intensive care patients.
    Ferring M, Reber G, de Moerloose P, Merlani P, Diby M, Ricou B.
    Can J Anaesth; 2001 Dec; 48(11):1155-60. PubMed ID: 11744594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring.
    Ryan F, O'Shea S, Byrne S.
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 1):e26-33. PubMed ID: 19032373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Point-of-care testing of neonatal coagulation.
    Tan K, Booth D, Newell SJ, Dear PR, Hughes C, Richards M.
    Clin Lab Haematol; 2006 Apr; 28(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 16630216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Point-of-care testing for prothrombin time, but not activated partial thromboplastin time, correlates with laboratory methods in patients receiving aprotinin or epsilon-aminocaproic acid while undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Choi TS, Greilich PE, Shi C, Wilson JS, Keller A, Kroll MH.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jan; 117(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 11789734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of drawing a discard tube on PT and APTT results in healthy adults.
    Bamberg R, Cottle JN, Williams JC.
    Clin Lab Sci; 2003 Jan; 16(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12587654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.