These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

603 related items for PubMed ID: 19192832

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May 01; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 May 01; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Z.
    Oper Dent; 2010 May 01; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. One-year clinical evaluation of composite restorations in posterior teeth: effect of adhesive systems.
    Sundfeld RH, Scatolin RS, Oliveira FG, Machado LS, Alexandre RS, Sundefeld ML.
    Oper Dent; 2012 May 01; 37(6):E1-8. PubMed ID: 22621163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
    Shafiei F, Memarpour M, Doozandeh M.
    Oper Dent; 2010 May 01; 35(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 21179997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
    Popoff DA, Santa Rosa TT, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Mjör IA.
    Oper Dent; 2012 May 01; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct 01; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV, Blaser PK, Watson RE, Mjör IA, McEdward DL, Sensi LG, Riley JL.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct 01; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings.
    Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Lima FG, Donassollo TA, André Dde A, Leida FL.
    J Dent; 2007 Mar 01; 35(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 17034926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
    Dresch W, Volpato S, Gomes JC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A, Loguercio AD.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Mar 01; 31(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 16924980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.
    Yazici AR, Baseren M, Gorucu J.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Mar 01; 35(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 20945740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun 01; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C, Rêgo HM, Perote LC, Santos LF, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Di Nicoló R, Borges AB.
    J Dent; 2014 Jul 01; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.