These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

292 related items for PubMed ID: 19194292

  • 1. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.
    Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 19194292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
    Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Apr; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE, Wilson RH, Larson V, Williams D.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
    Bishop CE, Hamadain E, Galster JA, Johnson MF, Spankovich C, Windmill I.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Dec; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K, Valente M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Dec; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA, Henry PP, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Seeto A, Searchfield GD.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V, Purcell DW, Aiken SJ, Parsa V, Scollie SD.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Mar; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P, Munro KJ, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Mar; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Mar; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
    Valente M, Oeding K.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L, Dillon H, Seymour J, Seeto M, Van Dun B.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Predicting Aided Outcome With Aided Word Recognition Scores Measured With Linear Amplification at Above-conversational Levels.
    Fereczkowski M, Neher T.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Oct; 44(1):155-166. PubMed ID: 36006438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.
    Levy SC, Freed DJ, Nilsson M, Moore BC, Puria S.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Oct; 36(5):e214-24. PubMed ID: 25856543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K, Pok SM, Schloegel M, Filzmoser P.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC, Johnson JS, Clark TM, Pluvinage V.
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J, Marrone N, Muller T.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Oct; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Kuk F, Seper E, Lau CC, Korhonen P.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Relationship of Grammatical Context on Children's Recognition of s/z-Inflected Words.
    Spratford M, McLean HH, McCreery R.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):799-809. PubMed ID: 28972469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.