These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


271 related items for PubMed ID: 19197974

  • 1. Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon.
    Agrawal G, Su MY, Nalcioglu O, Feig SA, Chen JH.
    Cancer; 2009 Apr 01; 115(7):1363-80. PubMed ID: 19197974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Multiparametric MRI model with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging enables breast cancer diagnosis with high accuracy.
    Zhang M, Horvat JV, Bernard-Davila B, Marino MA, Leithner D, Ochoa-Albiztegui RE, Helbich TH, Morris EA, Thakur S, Pinker K.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar 01; 49(3):864-874. PubMed ID: 30375702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies.
    Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl CK, Kaiser WA, Weinreb JC, Smazal SF, Degani H, Viehweg P, Barclay J, Schnall MD.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Jun 01; 13(6):889-95. PubMed ID: 11382949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr 01; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Non-masslike enhancement on breast MRI: interpretation pearls].
    Thomassin-Naggara I, Salem C, Darai E, Bazot M, Uzan S, Marsault C, Chopier J.
    J Radiol; 2009 Mar 01; 90(3 Pt 1):269-75. PubMed ID: 19421111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
    Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H.
    Radiographics; 2016 Mar 01; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. High resolution MRI of the breast at 3 T: which BI-RADS® descriptors are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer?
    Pinker-Domenig K, Bogner W, Gruber S, Bickel H, Duffy S, Schernthaner M, Dubsky P, Pluschnig U, Rudas M, Trattnig S, Helbich TH.
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Feb 01; 22(2):322-30. PubMed ID: 21913060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.
    Molleran V, Mahoney MC.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May 01; 18(2):171-85, vii. PubMed ID: 20494304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interpretation of Breast MRI Utilizing the BI-RADS Fifth Edition Lexicon: How Are We Doing and Where Are We Headed?
    Shin K, Phalak K, Hamame A, Whitman GJ.
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2017 May 01; 46(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 26826797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.
    Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Bassett LW, Rubin DL, Lee CH, Ikeda DM, Mendelson EB, Wilcox PA, Butler PF, D'Orsi CJ.
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Dec 01; 6(12):851-60. PubMed ID: 19945040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast MRI: interobserver variability in the description and assignment of BI-RADS category.
    El Khoury M, Lalonde L, David J, Labelle M, Mesurolle B, Trop I.
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan 01; 84(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 25454100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. BI-RADS-MRI: a primer.
    Erguvan-Dogan B, Whitman GJ, Kushwaha AC, Phelps MJ, Dempsey PJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug 01; 187(2):W152-60. PubMed ID: 16861504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the applicability of BI-RADS® MRI for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Travieso-Aja MM, Maldonado-Saluzzi D, Naranjo-Santana P, Fernández-Ruiz C, Severino-Rondón W, Rodríguez Rodríguez M, Luzardo OP.
    Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019 Aug 01; 61(6):477-488. PubMed ID: 31262509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. MRI in the Assessment of BI-RADS® 4 lesions.
    Leithner D, Wengert G, Helbich T, Morris E, Pinker K.
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct 01; 26(5):191-199. PubMed ID: 28961568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Value of Lesion Size as an Adjunct to the BI-RADS-MRI 2013 Descriptors in the Diagnosis of Solitary Breast Masses.
    Kawai M, Kataoka M, Kanao S, Iima M, Onishi N, Ohashi A, Sakaguchi R, Toi M, Togashi K.
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jul 10; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 29213007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.
    Edwards SD, Lipson JA, Ikeda DM, Lee JM.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Aug 10; 21(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 23928239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. BI-RADS update.
    Mercado CL.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May 10; 52(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24792650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Interobserver Variability Between Breast Imagers Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS MRI Lexicon.
    Grimm LJ, Anderson AL, Baker JA, Johnson KS, Walsh R, Yoon SC, Ghate SV.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May 10; 204(5):1120-4. PubMed ID: 25905951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Who should have breast magnetic resonance imaging evaluation?
    Orel S.
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Feb 10; 26(5):703-11. PubMed ID: 18258977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Current Status and Future of BI-RADS in Multimodality Imaging, From the AJR Special Series on Radiology Reporting and Data Systems.
    Eghtedari M, Chong A, Rakow-Penner R, Ojeda-Fournier H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr 10; 216(4):860-873. PubMed ID: 33295802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.