These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The effect of crank rate on physiological responses and exercise efficiency using a range of submaximal workloads during arm crank ergometry. Smith PM, Doherty M, Price MJ. Int J Sports Med; 2006 Mar; 27(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 16541375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Circulatory and metabolic responses of women to arm crank and wheelchair ergometry. Sedlock DA, Knowlton RG, Fitzgerald PI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Feb; 71(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 2302053 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of an increasing versus constant crank rate on peak physiological responses during incremental arm crank ergometry. Price MJ, Bottoms L, Smith PM, Nicholettos A. J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb 15; 29(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 21154011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Arm crank vs handrim wheelchair propulsion: metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses. Smith PA, Glaser RM, Petrofsky JS, Underwood PD, Smith GB, Richard JJ. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun 15; 64(6):249-54. PubMed ID: 6860094 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of a fast ramp rate on peak cardiopulmonary parameters during arm crank ergometry. Castro RR, Pedrosa S, Chabalgoity F, Sousa EB, Nobrega AC. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2010 Nov 15; 30(6):420-5. PubMed ID: 20718807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Arm crank ergometry and shoulder pain in persons with spinal cord injury. Dyson-Hudson TA, Sisto SA, Bond Q, Emmons R, Kirshblum SC. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Dec 15; 88(12):1727-9. PubMed ID: 18047893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]